ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2018
Identification of subsets of actionable genetic alterations in KRAS-mutant lung cancers using association rule mining.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aurora A kinase and its activator TPX2 are potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-induced pancreatic cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- CDK7 inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for lung squamous cell carcinomas with a SOX2 amplification.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. KRAS mutations occur in ~ 25% of patients with lung cancer, and the presence of these mutations is associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, efforts to directly target KRAS or its associated downstream MAPK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways have seen little or no benefits. Here, I hypothesize that KRAS-mutant tumors do not respond to KRAS pathway therapies due to the co-occurrence of other activated cell survival pathways and/or mechanisms. METHODS AND
resultsTo identify other potentially activated cell survival pathways in KRAS-mutant tumors, I performed association rule mining on somatic mutations in 725 metastatic lung cancer patient samples. I identified 67 additional genes that were mutated in at least 10% of the samples with KRAS mutations. This gene list was enriched with genes involved in the MAPK, AKT and STAT3 pathways, as well as in cell-cell adhesion, DNA repair, chromatin remodeling and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. I also identified 160 overlapping subsets of three or more genes that code for oncogenic or tumor suppressive proteins that were mutated in at least 10% of the KRAS-mutant tumors.
conclusionsI identified several genes that are co-mutated in primary KRAS-mutant lung cancer samples. I also identified subpopulations of KRAS-mutant lung cancers based on sets of genes that were co-mutated. Pre-clinical models that capture these subsets of KRAS-mutant tumors may enhance our understanding of lung cancer development and, in addition, facilitate the design of personalized treatment strategies for lung cancer patients carrying KRAS mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.