Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29691216›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology-Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review.

Sanne B Overdijkink, Adeline V Velu, Ageeth N Rosman, Monique Dm van Beukering, Marjolein Kok, Regine Pm Steegers-Theunissen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04752787 (The Effect of QR Code Supported Online Breastfeeding Training Given to Pregnant Women Expecting Twin Babies on Breastfeeding Intention and Feeding With Breast Milk in the First Six Months), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
47.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04752787 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of QR Code Supported Online Breastfeeding Training Given to Pregnant Women Expecting Twin Babies on Breastfeeding Intention and Feeding With Breast Milk in the First Six Months

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled102ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsOnline breastfeeding training, QR code supported online breastfeeding training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne B Overdijkink *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-421X
Adeline V Velu *Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-5748
Ageeth N RosmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-2950
Monique Dm van BeukeringAcademic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0459-8997
Marjolein KokAcademic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-2313
Regine Pm Steegers-TheunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-5756
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing number of mobile health (mHealth) technology-based apps are being developed for personal lifestyle and medical health care support, of which several apps are related to pregnancy. Evidence on usability and effectiveness is limited but crucial for successful implementation.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the usability, that is, feasibility and acceptability, as well as effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical apps to support health care during pregnancy in high-income countries. Feasibility was defined as the actual use, interest, intention, and continued use; perceived suitability; and ability of users to carry out the activities of the app. Acceptability was assessed by user satisfaction, appreciation, and the recommendation of the app to others.

methodsWe performed a systematic review searching the following electronic databases for studies on mHealth technology-based apps in maternal health care in developed countries: EMBASE, MEDLINE Epub (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All included studies were scored on quality, using the ErasmusAGE Quality Score or the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Main outcome measures were usability and effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical health care support apps related to pregnancy. All studies were screened by 2 reviewers individually, and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed.

resultsOur search identified 4204 titles and abstracts, of which 2487 original studies remained after removing duplicates. We performed full-text screening of 217 studies, of which 29 were included in our study. In total, 19 out of 29 studies reported on mHealth apps to adopt healthy lifestyles and 10 out of 29 studies to support medical care. The lifestyle apps evaluated in 19 studies reported on usability and effectiveness: 10 studies reported positive on acceptability, and 14 studies reported on feasibility with positive results except one study. In total, 4 out of 19 studies evaluating effectiveness showed significant results on weight gain restriction during pregnancy, intake of vegetables and fruits, and smoking cessation. The 10 studies on medical mHealth apps involved asthma care, diabetic treatment, and encouraging vaccination. Only one study on diabetic treatment reported on acceptability with a positive user satisfaction. In total, 9 out of 10 studies reported on effectiveness. Moreover, the power of most studies was inadequate to show significant effects.

conclusionsMost studies on mHealth apps to support lifestyle and medical care for high-income countries reveal the usability of these apps to reduce gestational weight gain, increase intakes of vegetables and fruit, to quit smoking cessation, and to support health care for prevention of asthma and infections during pregnancy. In general, the evidence on effectiveness of these apps is limited and needs further investigation before implementation in medical health care.

Indexed as

health carelifestylematernal healthmHealthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29691216
PMCPMC5941088
OpenAlexW2802157421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.