Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29697304›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2018

Deep learning in pharmacogenomics: from gene regulation to patient stratification.

Alexandr A Kalinin, Gerald A Higgins, Narathip Reamaroon, Sayedmohammadreza Soroushmehr, Ari Allyn-Feuer, Ivo D Dinov, Kayvan Najarian, Brian D Athey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Machine-Learning-Aided Advanced Electrochemical Biosensors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandr A KalininDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Gerald A HigginsDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Narathip ReamaroonDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Sayedmohammadreza SoroushmehrDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ari Allyn-FeuerDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ivo D DinovDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kayvan NajarianDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Brian D AtheyDepartment of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karen Eileen Peterson · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
TrainingU54EB020406 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIEBERMAN, ANDREW P · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAUER, WILLIAM T. · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Training Program in BioinformaticsT32GM070449 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID, BURMEISTER, MARGIT · 2005 to 2020
$3.6M
Pilot Projects CoreP20NR015331 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DINOV, IVO D · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020406NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089503NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM070449NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856NINR NIH HHS P20 NR015331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Perspective provides examples of current and future applications of deep learning in pharmacogenomics, including: identification of novel regulatory variants located in noncoding domains of the genome and their function as applied to pharmacoepigenomics; patient stratification from medical records; and the mechanistic prediction of drug response, targets and their interactions. Deep learning encapsulates a family of machine learning algorithms that has transformed many important subfields of artificial intelligence over the last decade, and has demonstrated breakthrough performance improvements on a wide range of tasks in biomedicine. We anticipate that in the future, deep learning will be widely used to predict personalized drug response and optimize medication selection and dosing, using knowledge extracted from large and complex molecular, epidemiological, clinical and demographic datasets.

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, EducationalAlgorithmsDatabases as TopicHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPharmacogeneticsadverse eventsartificial intelligencedeep learningdrug discoverydrug–drug interactiondrug–gene interactionnoncoding regulatory variationpatient stratificationpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID29697304
PMCPMC6022084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.