Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2018
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of T2DM: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide compared with the first-line hypoglycemic drugs in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Occurrence of Thyroid Disorders: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Hemoglobin A1c Reduction or Weight Reduction on Blood Pressure in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of GZR18, a long-acting GLP-1 analog, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, phase 1b/2a trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of efsubaglutide alfa in individuals with type 2 diabetes (SUPER1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase IIb/III trial.Diabetologia · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Achieving the composite end-point of glycated hemoglobin <7.0% without weight gain or hypoglycemia with once-weekly dulaglutide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2020Trial
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2020Trial
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Compared with GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: A Network Meta-analysis.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Weekly GLP-1/GIP Agonists vs. Weekly Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Targeting the incretin system in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024Review
- Effectiveness and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a retrospective real-world study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of Patients with T2DM in the Post-marketing Safety Study of Dulaglutide in China (TRUST-CHN).Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022Article
- Changing the approach to type 2 diabetes treatment: A comparison of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sulphonylureas across the continuum of care.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2021Review
- Pancreatic Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Subgroup Analysis by Potential Influencing Factors.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Characteristics of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events with Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Treatment in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Trials.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Monotherapy Compared to Glimepiride in Oral Antihyperglycemic Medication-Naïve Chinese patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of AWARD-CHN1.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide by Baseline HbA1c in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, 26-week study, patients with inadequate glycaemic control were randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 or 0.75 mg or daily glimepiride (1-3 mg/d). The primary endpoint was assessment of the non-inferiority of dulaglutide (1.5 mg), as measured by change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), compared with glimepiride using a 0.4% non-inferiority margin.
resultsA total of 737 patients were randomized (dulaglutide 1.5 mg, n = 244; dulaglutide 0.75 mg, n = 248; glimepiride, n = 245). At week 26, both doses of dulaglutide were non-inferior and also superior to glimepiride for HbA1c reduction from baseline with a least squares mean difference of -6.34 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.31, -4.26) or -0.58% (95% CI -0.76, -0.39) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg and -3.50 mmol/mol (95% CI -5.47, -1.42) or -0.32% (95% CI -0.50, -0.13) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg (P < .001). A greater proportion of patients in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg group achieved the HbA1c target of <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) compared with the glimepiride group (74.1% vs 57.4%; P < .001). The mean body weight decreased (P < .005) and total hypoglycaemia rates were lower (P < .001) in the dulaglutide groups compared with the glimepiride group. The most common drug-related adverse events in both dulaglutide groups (≥5% of patients) included diarrhoea, nausea, increased lipase, decreased appetite, abdominal distension and vomiting.
conclusionsDulaglutide (both doses) demonstrated superior glycaemic control vs glimepiride, with a favourable tolerability and safety profile in East-Asian patients with T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.