Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713899›Full record

ReviewEcoHealth2018

Global Diversity and Distribution of Hantaviruses and Their Hosts.

Matthew T Milholland, Iván Castro-Arellano, Gerardo Suzán, Gabriel E Garcia-Peña, Thomas E Lee, Rodney E Rohde, A Alonso Aguirre, James N Mills

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Small rodents, huge impact: A scoping review of EuropeanOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Hantavirus stability and inactivation.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew T MilhollandDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
Iván Castro-ArellanoDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA. ic13@txstate.edu.
Gerardo SuzánFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Gabriel E Garcia-PeñaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, México City, Mexico.
Thomas E LeeDepartment of Biology, Abilene Christian University, ACU Box 27868, Abilene, TX, 79699, USA.
Rodney E RohdeCollege of Health Professions, Clinical Laboratory Science Program, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
A Alonso AguirreDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
James N MillsPopulation Biology, Ecology, and Evolution Program, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Texas State University · USAbilene Christian University · USEmory University · USGeorge Mason University · USInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodents represent 42% of the world's mammalian biodiversity encompassing 2,277 species populating every continent (except Antarctica) and are reservoir hosts for a wide diversity of disease agents. Thus, knowing the identity, diversity, host-pathogen relationships, and geographic distribution of rodent-borne zoonotic pathogens, is essential for predicting and mitigating zoonotic disease outbreaks. Hantaviruses are hosted by numerous rodent reservoirs. However, the diversity of rodents harboring hantaviruses is likely unknown because research is biased toward specific reservoir hosts and viruses. An up-to-date, systematic review covering all known rodent hosts is lacking. Herein, we document gaps in our knowledge of the diversity and distribution of rodent species that host hantaviruses. Of the currently recognized 681 cricetid, 730 murid, 61 nesomyid, and 278 sciurid species, we determined that 11.3, 2.1, 1.6, and 1.1%, respectively, have known associations with hantaviruses. The diversity of hantaviruses hosted by rodents and their distribution among host species supports a reassessment of the paradigm that each virus is associated with a single-host species. We examine these host-virus associations on a global taxonomic and geographical scale with emphasis on the rodent host diversity and distribution. Previous reviews have been centered on the viruses and not the mammalian hosts. Thus, we provide a perspective not previously addressed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ReservoirsOrthohantavirusRodentiaZoonosesEpidemic nephropathyHCPSHFRSHost-specific strainMammalian host reservoirsRodentsViral diversity

Identifiers

PMID29713899
OpenAlexW2799661186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.