ArticleMetabolic syndrome and related disorders2018
International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution Among Four Populations: The ERA-JUMP Study.
Article in Metabolic syndrome and related disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes: does visceral fat play a role? Evidence from the MESA study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Association between Epicardial Adipose Tissue Volume and Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Observational
- Relationship between obesity indices and cognitive function in Japanese men: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Fatty liver index predicts the development of hypertension in a Japanese general population with and without dysglycemia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- A Genome-Wide Association Study on Abdominal Adiposity-Related Traits in Adult Korean Men.Obesity facts · 2022Article
- Gut Microbiome, Inflammation, and Cerebrovascular Function: Link Between Obesity and Cognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Genetic and Environmental Factors Contributing to Visceral Adiposity in Asian Populations.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal fat distribution varies across groups with different races or environments. Whether environmental factors, apart from racial differences, affect abdominal fat distribution is unknown.
methodsWe compared the abdominal fat distribution of four groups; different races with similar environments (Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), different environments with an identical race (Japanese Americans vs. Japanese), and similar races with similar environments (Japanese vs. Koreans). A population-based sample of 1212 men aged 40-49 were analyzed: 307 Caucasians and 300 Japanese Americans in the United States, 310 Japanese in Japan, and 295 Koreans in Korea. We compared the proportion of visceral adipose tissue area to total abdominal adipose tissue area (VAT%) and other factors that can affect abdominal fat distribution (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity levels, and metabolic factors).
resultsVAT% was significantly higher in Japanese and Koreans than in Japanese Americans and Caucasians (50.0, 48.5, 43.2, 41.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for possible confounders, the significant VAT% difference remained in comparing groups with identical race but different environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Japanese Americans). In contrast, comparing groups with different races but similar environments (i.e., Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), VAT% was not significantly different. Comparing groups with similar races and similar environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Koreans), VAT% did not significantly differ.
conclusionsEnvironmental differences, apart from racial differences, affect the difference in abdominal fat distribution across different groups in middle-aged men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.