Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718487›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2018

Influence of Supplemental Protein on the Life Expectancy and Reproduction of the Chinese Citrus Fruit Fly, Bactrocera minax (Enderlein) (Tetradacus minax) (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Fulian Wang, Consolatha Chambi, Zaiyuan Li, Cong Huang, Yuekun Ma, Chuanren Li, Xiaohai Tian, Frank Sangija, Mbuya Sylvain Ntambo, Onesime M Kankonda and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fulian WangHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Consolatha ChambiHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Zaiyuan LiHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Cong HuangHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Yuekun MaHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Chuanren LiHubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Xiaohai TianEngineering Research of Ecology and Agricultural Uses of Wetlands (China Ministry of Education), Yangtze University Jingzhou, Hubei, P.R. China.
Frank SangijaCollege of food science, Southwest University, Beibei Chongqing, China PRC.
Mbuya Sylvain NtamboNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Onesime M KankondaLaboratory of Ecology and Management of Animal Resources, Faculty of Sciences and Biodiversity Monitoring Center, University of Kisangani, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Sumaira HafeezEngineering Research of Ecology and Agricultural Uses of Wetlands (China Ministry of Education), Yangtze University Jingzhou, Hubei, P.R. China.
Toheed AnwarEngineering Research of Ecology and Agricultural Uses of Wetlands (China Ministry of Education), Yangtze University Jingzhou, Hubei, P.R. China.
Rahat SharifCollege of Horticulture, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Yangtze University · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNNorthwest A&F University · CNSouthwest University · CNUniversité de Kisangani · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bactrocera minax (Enderlein) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major citrus pest in China, whose artificial rearing technology of the adult is not well documented to date. In this study, we tried to determine if supplementing proteins to the adult diet could result in the enhancement of some fitness parameters of B. minax. Four feeds with varying protein source were provided as F0 (water), F1 (sucrose), F2 (sucrose + yeast), and F3 (sucrose + peptone). F0 and F1 being the control, F2 and F3 were protein food types. The results showed that adults fed by F2 and F3 lived longer with 40.1 d and 32.8 d, respectively, had reduced death rates (death peaks were delayed for 5.6 d and 4.1 d, respectively), increased mating frequencies (8.1 and 5.3 per females, 4.7 and 7.3 per males, respectively), and longer mating durations (with 42 d and 34 d). In addition, females recorded an increased adult ovary development, more egg load (with 94.8 and 77.3 brood eggs per ovary) and to greater oviposition rates of 63.2 eggs/female and 19.3 eggs/female. Based on our results, protein supplements enhanced B. minax survival, mating, and fecundity. This study does not only provide basic knowledge to implement artificial rearing of B. minax, but also deepens our understanding on its physiology that could be used to enhance the management of the pest.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsTephritidaeAnimalsDietary ProteinsFemaleFertilityLongevityMaleOvipositionSexual Behavior, AnimalDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29718487
PMCPMC5842393
OpenAlexW2790770482

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.