ReviewMolecular medicine reports2018
Computational approaches for predicting key transcription factors in targeted cell reprogramming (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- FOXK1 induced upregulation of KIF20A promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via Wnt/β-Catenin/EMT signaling.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- TFcomb identifies transcription factor combinations for cellular reprogramming based on single-cell multiomics data.Genome research · 2025Article
- SCIG: Machine learning uncovers cell identity genes in single cells by genetic sequence codes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Advancements in bioengineering for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Updated Perspectives on Direct Vascular Cellular Reprogramming and Their Potential Applications in Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Probabilistic boolean networks predict transcription factor targets to induce transdifferentiation.iScience · 2022Article
- Epigenetic reprogramming of cell identity: lessons from development for regenerative medicine.Clinical epigenetics · 2021Review
- Molecular mechanisms of transcription factor mediated cell reprogramming: conversion of liver to pancreas.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need for specific cell types in regenerative medicine and biological research. Frequently, specific cell types may not be easily obtained or the quantity obtained is insufficient for study. Therefore, reprogramming by the direct conversion (transdifferentiation) or re‑induction of induced pluripotent stem cells has been used to obtain cells expressing similar profiles to those of the desired types. Therefore, a specific cocktail of transcription factors (TFs) is required for induction. Nevertheless, identifying the correct combination of TFs is difficult. Although certain computational approaches have been proposed for this task, their methods are complex, and corresponding implementations are difficult to use and generalize for specific source or target cell types. In the present review four computational approaches that have been proposed to obtain likely TFs were compared and discussed. A simplified view of the computational complexity of these methods is provided that consists of three basic ideas: i) The definition of target and non‑target cell types; ii) the estimation of candidate TFs; and iii) filtering candidates. This simplified view was validated by analyzing a well‑documented cardiomyocyte differentiation. Subsequently, these reviewed methods were compared when applied to an unknown differentiation of corneal endothelial cells. The generated results may provide important insights for laboratory assays. Data and computer scripts that may assist with direct conversions in other cell types are also provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.