Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29888550›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA2018

High throughput sequencing revolution reveals conserved fundamentals of U-indel editing.

Sara L Zimmer, Rachel M Simpson, Laurie K Read

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assembly and Annotation of Kinetoplastid and Diplonemid Mitochondrial Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Evolutionary divergent kinetoplast genome structure and RNA editing patterns in the trypanosomatidProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mitochondrial RNA editing inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Mitochondrial RNA quality control in trypanosomes.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara L ZimmerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, Minnesota.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1707-1839
Rachel M SimpsonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-3410
Laurie K ReadDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.

Funding

Regulation of RNA editing in Trypansoma bruceiR01AI061580 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI READ, LAURIE K. · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
Kinetoplastid RNA editingR01GM129041 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI READ, LAURIE K. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
American Heart Association 16SDG26420019NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI061580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129041NIH HHS AI061580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among Euglenozoans, mitochondrial RNA editing occurs in the diplonemids and in the kinetoplastids that include parasitic trypanosomes. Yet U-indel editing, in which open reading frames (ORFs) on mRNAs are generated by insertion and deletion of uridylates in locations dictated by guide RNAs, appears confined to kinetoplastids. The nature of guide RNA and edited mRNA populations has been cursorily explored in a surprisingly extensive number of species over the years, although complete sets of fully edited mRNAs for most kinetoplast genomes are largely missing. Now, however, high throughput sequencing technologies have had an enormous impact on what we know and will learn about the mechanisms, benefits, and final edited products of U-indel editing. Tools including PARERS, TREAT, and T-Aligner function to organize and make sense of U-indel mRNA transcriptomes, which are comprised of mRNAs harboring uridylate indels both consistent and inconsistent with translatable products. From high throughput sequencing data come arguments that partially edited mRNAs containing "junction regions" of noncanonical editing are editing intermediates, and conversely, arguments that they are dead-end products. These data have also revealed that the percent of a given transcript population that is fully or partially edited varies dramatically between transcripts and organisms. Outstanding questions that are being addressed include the prevalence of sequences that apparently encode alternative ORFs, diversity of editing events in ORF termini and 5' and 3' untranslated regions, and the differences that exist in this byzantine process between species. High throughput sequencing technologies will also undoubtedly be harnessed to probe U-indel editing's evolutionary origins. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Evolution and Genomics > Computational Analyses of RNA.

Indexed as

constructive neutral evolutionevolvabilityparasitologyRNA editing core complexRNA editing substrate binding complex

Identifiers

PMID29888550
PMCPMC6289883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.