Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29896319›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2018

Specific properties of probiotic strains: relevance and benefits for the host.

Rostyslav V Bubnov, Lidiia P Babenko, Liudmyla M Lazarenko, Victoria V Mokrozub, Mykola Ya Spivak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rostyslav V Bubnov1Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Zabolotny str., 154, Kyiv, 03143 Ukraine.
Lidiia P Babenko1Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Zabolotny str., 154, Kyiv, 03143 Ukraine.
Liudmyla M Lazarenko1Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Zabolotny str., 154, Kyiv, 03143 Ukraine.
Victoria V Mokrozub1Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Zabolotny str., 154, Kyiv, 03143 Ukraine.
Mykola Ya Spivak1Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Zabolotny str., 154, Kyiv, 03143 Ukraine.
Danylo Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotics have tremendous potential to develop healthy diets, treatment, and prevention. Investigation of in vitro cultural properties of health-promoting microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bifidobacteria is crucial to select probiotic strains for treatments based on gut microbiota modulation to justify individualized and personalized approach for nutrition and prevention of variety of diseases. The MATERIALS AND

methodsWe studied six LAB strains (

resultsThe studied strains of LAB and bifidobacteria did not form spores, were positively stained by Gram, grow on medium in a wide range of pH (1.0-9.0, optimum pH 5.5-6.5), were sensitive to a wide range of antibiotics; and showed different resistance to gastric juice, bile, and pancreatic enzymes. The most resistant to antibiotics were

conclusionWe recognized strain-dependent properties of studied LAB and bifidobacteria probiotic strains (adhesive ability, resistance to antibiotics, and gut biological fluids) and discussed potential for most effective individualized treatment for gut and distant sites microbiome modulation.

Indexed as

Adhesive propertiesAntibioticsBifidobacteriumBileGastric juiceGut microbiotaIndividualized medicineLactobacillusPancreatic enzymesPatient phenotypePiliPredictive preventive personalized medicineProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID29896319
PMCPMC5972142
OpenAlexW2797741659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.