Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29909556›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2018

The urinary microbiome in women with mixed urinary incontinence compared to similarly aged controls.

Yuko M Komesu, Holly E Richter, Benjamin Carper, Darrell L Dinwiddie, Emily S Lukacz, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Vivian W Sung, Halina M Zyczynski, Beri Ridgeway, Rebecca G Rogers and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Urinary Microbiome in Health and Disease: Relevance for Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yuko M KomesuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC 10 5580 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA. ykomesu@salud.unm.edu.
Holly E RichterObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Benjamin CarperSocial, Statistical & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Darrell L DinwiddiePediatrics and Clinical Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Emily S LukaczDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nazema Y SiddiquiObstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Vivian W SungObstetrics & Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Halina M ZyczynskiObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Beri RidgewayObstetrics & Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rebecca G RogersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC 10 5580 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA.
Lily A AryaObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donna MazloomdoostGynecologic Health and Disease Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marie G GantzSocial, Statistical & Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
University of New Mexico · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USNational Institutes of Health · USRTI International · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)U01HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GANTZ, MARIE G · 2011 to 2015
$19.7M
Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialU10HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
The Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteU10HD054215 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARBER, MATTHEW D · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Site (UG1)UG1HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Vivian W Sung · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Site Application: The San Diego PelvicFloor ConsortiumUG1HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EMILY S. LUKACZ, Shawn A Menefee · 2016 to 2026
$2.9M
Brain-Centered Therapy versus Medication for Urgency Urinary Incontinence_An RCTR01AT007171 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI KETAI, LOREN HOWARD, KOMESU, YUKO MARGARET · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARYA, LILY A · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network SiteU10HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI SUNG, VIVIAN W · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Grant Number ULTR001449).NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT007171NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069013NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069025NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069013NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069025NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK110417The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1-U10-HD069025-01, 2-U10-HD041261-11, 2-U10-HD041267-12, 1-U10-HD069013-01, 2-U10-HD054214-06, 2-U10-HD054215-06, 1-U10-HD069010-01, 1-U10-HD069006-01, 1-U01HD069031-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION & HYPOTHESIS: Previous studies have suggested that women with urinary incontinence have an altered urinary microbiome. We hypothesized that the microbiome in women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) differed from controls and tested this hypothesis using bacterial gene sequencing techniques.

methodsThis multicenter study compared the urinary microbiome in women with MUI and similarly aged controls. Catheterized urine samples were obtained; v4-6 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced to identify bacteria. Bacterial predominance (> 50% of an individual's genera) was compared between MUI and controls. Bacterial sequences were categorized into "community types" using Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) methods. Generalized linear mixed models predicted MUI/control status based on clinical characteristics and community type. Post-hoc analyses were performed in women < 51 and ≥ 51 years. Sample size estimates required 200 samples to detect a 20% difference in Lactobacillus predominance with P < 0.05.

resultsOf 212 samples, 97.6% were analyzed (123 MUI/84 controls, mean age 53 ± 11 years). Overall Lactobacillus predominance did not differ between MUI and controls (45/123 = 36.6% vs. 36/84 = 42.9%, P = 0.36). DMM analyses revealed six community types; communities differed by age (P = 0.001). A High-Lactobacillus (89.2% Lactobacillus) community had a greater proportion of controls (19/84 = 22.6%, MUI 11/123 = 8.9%). Overall, bacterial community types did not differ in MUI and controls. However, post-hoc analysis of women < 51 years found that bacterial community types distinguished MUI from controls (P = 0.041); Moderate-Lactobacillus (aOR 7.78, CI 1.85-32.62) and Mixed (aOR 7.10, CI 1.32-38.10) community types were associated with MUI. Community types did not differentiate MUI and controls in women ≥ 51 years (P = 0.94).

conclusionsWomen with MUI and controls did not differ in overall Lactobacillus predominance. In younger women, urinary bacterial community types differentiated MUI from controls.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLactobacillusLinear ModelsMicrobiotaMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary IncontinenceUrinary TractRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingFemale urinary microbiome (FUM)LactobacillusMenopausal statusMixed urinary incontinenceUrinary microbiome

Identifiers

PMID29909556
PMCPMC6295358
OpenAlexW2808168716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.