Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912865›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Evolution of chemokine receptors is driven by mutations in the sodium binding site.

Bruck Taddese, Madeline Deniaud, Antoine Garnier, Asma Tiss, Hajer Guissouma, Hervé Abdi, Daniel Henrion, Marie Chabbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruck TaddeseLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Madeline DeniaudLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Antoine GarnierLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Asma TissLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Hajer GuissoumaLaboratoire de Génétique, Immunologie et Pathologies Humaines, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisie.
Hervé AbdiThe University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Daniel HenrionLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Marie ChabbertLaboratoire MITOVASC, UMR CNRS 6015 - INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5182-0987
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRTunis University · TNThe University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemokines and their receptors (members of the GPCR super-family) are involved in a wide variety of physiological processes and diseases; thus, understanding the specificity of the chemokine receptor family could help develop new receptor specific drugs. Here, we explore the evolutionary mechanisms that led to the emergence of the chemokine receptors. Based on GPCR hierarchical classification, we analyzed nested GPCR sets with an eigen decomposition approach of the sequence covariation matrix and determined three key residues whose mutation was crucial for the emergence of the chemokine receptors and their subsequent divergence into homeostatic and inflammatory receptors. These residues are part of the allosteric sodium binding site. Their structural and functional roles were investigated by molecular dynamics simulations of CXCR4 and CCR5 as prototypes of homeostatic and inflammatory chemokine receptors, respectively. This study indicates that the three mutations crucial for the evolution of the chemokine receptors dramatically altered the sodium binding mode. In CXCR4, the sodium ion is tightly bound by four protein atoms and one water molecule. In CCR5, the sodium ion is mobile within the binding pocket and moves between different sites involving from one to three protein atoms and two to five water molecules. Analysis of chemokine receptor evolution reveals that a highly constrained sodium binding site characterized most ancient receptors, and that the constraints were subsequently loosened during the divergence of this receptor family. We discuss the implications of these findings for the evolution of the chemokine receptor functions and mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

Allosteric SiteAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesBiological EvolutionChemokinesComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationPhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, CCR5Receptors, ChemokineChemokinesReceptors, CCR5Receptors, ChemokineReceptors, CXCR4Sodium

Identifiers

PMID29912865
PMCPMC6037435
OpenAlexW2808661197

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.