Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29923344›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Multisample adjusted U-statistics that account for confounding covariates.

Glen A Satten, Maiying Kong, Somnath Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Glen A SattenDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7275-5371
Maiying KongDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, SPHIS, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-9084
Somnath DattaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-1842

Funding

Exploratory Statistical Analysis of Differential Network Behaviors Based on Gene Expression Atlas of Palate DevelopmentR03DE025625 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DATTA, SOMNATH · 2016 to 2017
$460k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE025625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisample U-statistics encompass a wide class of test statistics that allow the comparison of 2 or more distributions. U-statistics are especially powerful because they can be applied to both numeric and nonnumeric data, eg, ordinal and categorical data where a pairwise similarity or distance-like measure between categories is available. However, when comparing the distribution of a variable across 2 or more groups, observed differences may be due to confounding covariates. For example, in a case-control study, the distribution of exposure in cases may differ from that in controls entirely because of variables that are related to both exposure and case status and are distributed differently among case and control participants. We propose to use individually reweighted data (ie, using the stratification score for retrospective data or the propensity score for prospective data) to construct adjusted U-statistics that can test the equality of distributions across 2 (or more) groups in the presence of confounding covariates. Asymptotic normality of our adjusted U-statistics is established and a closed form expression of their asymptotic variance is presented. The utility of our approach is demonstrated through simulation studies, as well as in an analysis of data from a case-control study conducted among African-Americans, comparing whether the similarity in haplotypes (ie, sets of adjacent genetic loci inherited from the same parent) occurring in a case and a control participant differs from the similarity in haplotypes occurring in 2 control participants.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnalysis of VarianceBiostatisticsBlack or African AmericanCase-Control StudiesCatechol O-MethyltransferaseComputer SimulationHaplotypesHumansPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSchizophreniaCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCOMT protein, humanadjusted U-statisticsmultiple group comparisonpropensity score

Identifiers

PMID29923344
PMCPMC6322553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.