Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29930304›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Methodology for Y Chromosome Capture: A complete genome sequence of  Y chromosome using flow cytometry, laser microdissection and magnetic streptavidin-beads.

M J Alvarez-Cubero, O Santiago, C Martínez-Labarga, B Martínez-García, R Marrero-Díaz, A Rubio-Roldan, A M Pérez-Gutiérrez, P Carmona-Saez, J A Lorente, L J Martinez-Gonzalez

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Tackling of Human Satellite DNA: Breaking Barriers through Time.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M J Alvarez-CuberoGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain. mjesusac@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-9355
O SantiagoGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
C Martínez-LabargaCentro di Antropologia Molecolare per lo Studio del DNA Antico, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Roma"Tor Vergata", via della Ricerca Scientifica n. 1, 00173, Rome, Italy.
B Martínez-GarcíaGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
R Marrero-DíazGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
A Rubio-RoldanGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
A M Pérez-GutiérrezGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
P Carmona-SaezGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
J A LorenteGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
L J Martinez-GonzalezGENYO (Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research), Av. Ilustracion, 114 - PTS - 18016, Granada, Spain.
Pfizer-University of Granada-Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research · ESUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is a comparison of the efficiency of three technologies used for Y chromosome capture and the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies applied for determining its whole sequence. Our main findings disclose that streptavidin-biotin magnetic particle-based capture methodology offers better and a deeper sequence coverage for Y chromosome capture, compared to chromosome sorting and microdissection procedures. Moreover, this methodology is less time consuming and the most selective for capturing only Y chromosomal material, in contrast with other methodologies that result in considerable background material from other, non-targeted chromosomes. NGS results compared between two platforms, NextSeq 500 and SOLID 5500xl, produce the same coverage results. This is the first study to explore a methodological comparison of Y chromosome capture and genetic analysis. Our results indicate an improved strategy for Y chromosome research with applications in several scientific fields where this chromosome plays an important role, such as forensics, medical sciences, molecular anthropology and cancer sciences.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedChromosomes, Human, YFlow CytometryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLaser Capture MicrodissectionMaleSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29930304
PMCPMC6013464
OpenAlexW2808332602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.