Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29942506›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2018

Attitudes of nephrologists towards assisted home dialysis in Germany.

Wolfgang Pommer, Steffen Wagner, Dominik Müller, Julia Thumfart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International Environmental Impact of CKD Care.Kidney international reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Availability of assisted peritoneal dialysis in Europe: call for increased and equal access.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang PommerKuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation (KfH), Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Steffen WagnerINWT Statistics, Berlin, Germany.
Dominik MüllerDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Julia ThumfartDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted home dialysis (AHD) is an option to combine the benefits of home dialysis therapy with the needs of dialysis patients who are unable to perform self-treatment at home. While this method is growing in many countries worldwide, no data so far are reported for Germany.

methodsA survey was designed to identify the barriers to the implementation of AHD with the focus on attitudes and beliefs concerning AHD. The survey was sent to all 2060 members of the Germany Society of Nephrology.

resultsThe response rate was 14% of nephrologists (

conclusionsIn the view of German nephrologists, AHD is a meaningful method to provide home dialysis care. Inadequate funding and a lack of qualified staff were identified as severe barriers to implementation of AHD. To overcome these barriers and to achieve a higher penetration of AHD, dedicated actions have to be considered. Further studies are needed to prove the AHD concept with regard to outcome effects and cost efficacy.

Indexed as

assisted home dialysishaemodialysisoutcomeperitoneal dialysisreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID29942506
PMCPMC6007628
OpenAlexW2767341903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.