Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29948540›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2018

Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.

C D Bertram, C Macaskill, M J Davis, J E Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C D BertramSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia. c.bertram@sydney.edu.au.
C MacaskillSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
M J DavisDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.
J E MooreDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Lymphatic pacemaking and pumping in lymphedema: function, dysfunction, and rescueR01HL122578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2015 to 2023
$4.1M
Transport Phenomena in the Lymphatic SystemU01HL123420 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI MOORE, JAMES E, ZAWIEJA, DAVID CARL · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Mechanisms of lymphatic valve and pump dysfunction in lymphedemaR01HL120867 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120867NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122578NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL123420NIH HHS R01-HL-120867NIH HHS U01-HL-123420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper describes the extension of a previously developed model of pressure-dependent contraction rate to the case of multiple lymphangions. Mechanical factors are key modulators of active lymphatic pumping. As part of the evolution of our lumped-parameter model to match experimental findings, we have designed an algorithm whereby the time until the next contraction depends on lymphangion transmural pressure in the contraction just completed. The functional dependence of frequency on pressure is quantitatively matched to isobaric contraction experiments on isolated lymphatic segments. When each of several lymphangions is given this ability, a scheme for their coordination must be instituted to match the observed synchronization. Accordingly, and in line with an experiment on an isolated lymphatic vessel segment in which we measured contraction sequence and conduction delay, we took the fundamental principle to be that local timing can be overridden by signals to initiate contraction that start in adjacent lymphangions, conducted with a short delay. The scheme leads to retrograde conduction when the lymphangion chain is pumping against an adverse pressure difference, but antegrade conduction when contractions occur with no or a favourable pressure difference. Abolition of these conducted signals leads to chaotic variation of cycle-mean flow-rate from the chain, diastolic duration in each lymphangion, and inter-lymphangion delays. Chaotic rhythm is also seen under other circumstances. Because the model responds to increasing adverse pressure difference by increasing the repetition rate of contractions, it maintains time-average output flow-rate better than one with fixed repetition rate.

Indexed as

PressureAnimalsDiastoleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLymphatic SystemMaleModels, BiologicalMuscle ContractionRats, Sprague-DawleyFluid-structure interactionLumped-parameter modelLymphatic pumpingLymph flowNumerical modelling

Identifiers

PMID29948540
PMCPMC6139274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.