ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2018
Contraction of collecting lymphatics: organization of pressure-dependent rate for multiple lymphangions.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerical modeling of fluid exchange between a collecting lymphatic vessel and the surrounding tissue.Journal of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Control of lymphatic pacemaking and pumping by mechanobiological signals.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Lumped parameter simulations of cervical lymphatic vessels: dynamics of murine cerebrospinal fluid efflux from the skull.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024Article
- The Lymphatic Vascular System: Does Nonuniform Lymphangion Length Limit Flow-Rate?Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Multiscale homogenization for dual porosity time-dependent Darcy-Brinkman/Darcy coupling and its application to the lymph node.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Computational fluid dynamic modeling of the lymphatic system: a review of existing models and future directions.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Review
- Case Report: The effect of automated manual lymphatic drainage therapy on lymphatic contractility in 4 distinct cases.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- A 1D model characterizing the role of spatiotemporal contraction distributions on lymph transport.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The paper describes the extension of a previously developed model of pressure-dependent contraction rate to the case of multiple lymphangions. Mechanical factors are key modulators of active lymphatic pumping. As part of the evolution of our lumped-parameter model to match experimental findings, we have designed an algorithm whereby the time until the next contraction depends on lymphangion transmural pressure in the contraction just completed. The functional dependence of frequency on pressure is quantitatively matched to isobaric contraction experiments on isolated lymphatic segments. When each of several lymphangions is given this ability, a scheme for their coordination must be instituted to match the observed synchronization. Accordingly, and in line with an experiment on an isolated lymphatic vessel segment in which we measured contraction sequence and conduction delay, we took the fundamental principle to be that local timing can be overridden by signals to initiate contraction that start in adjacent lymphangions, conducted with a short delay. The scheme leads to retrograde conduction when the lymphangion chain is pumping against an adverse pressure difference, but antegrade conduction when contractions occur with no or a favourable pressure difference. Abolition of these conducted signals leads to chaotic variation of cycle-mean flow-rate from the chain, diastolic duration in each lymphangion, and inter-lymphangion delays. Chaotic rhythm is also seen under other circumstances. Because the model responds to increasing adverse pressure difference by increasing the repetition rate of contractions, it maintains time-average output flow-rate better than one with fixed repetition rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.