Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29951754›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2018

Assessment of Three-Drug Combination Pharmacodynamic Interactions in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Emilie A G Molins, William J Jusko

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emilie A G MolinsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, 14214, USA.
William J JuskoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, 14214, USA. wjjusko@buffalo.edu.
Lyon College · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsR37GM024211 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 2005 to 2014
$6.4M
CORTICOSTEROID PHARMACOKINETICS/DYNAMICSR01GM024211 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 1985 to 2018
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024211NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM024211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacodynamic interactions among trifluoperazine (TFP), gemcitabine (GEM), and paclitaxel (PTX) were assessed in pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1). The phenothiazine TFP was chosen for its potential activity on cancer stem cells, while GEM and PTX cause apoptosis. Effects of each drug alone and in various combinations on cell growth inhibition of PANC-1 cells were studied in vitro to determine the drug-specific parameters and assess the nature of drug interactions. Joint inhibition (JI) and competitive inhibition (CI) equations were applied with a ψ interaction term. TFP fully inhibited growth of cells (I

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDeoxycytidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsGemcitabineHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Models, BiologicalNeoplastic Stem CellsPaclitaxelPancreatic NeoplasmsTrifluoperazineDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelTrifluoperazinecompetitive inhibitiondrug-drug interactionjoint inhibitionpancreatic cancerpharmacodynamic interaction

Identifiers

PMID29951754
PMCPMC7218410
OpenAlexW2811492671

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.