Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29953463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Triclosan and triclocarban exposure, infectious disease symptoms and antibiotic prescription in infants-A community-based randomized intervention.

Catherine Ley, Vandana Sundaram, Maria de la Luz Sanchez, Manisha Desai, Julie Parsonnet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine LeyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8424-7873
Vandana SundaramQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Maria de la Luz SanchezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Manisha DesaiQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Julie ParsonnetDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriclosan and triclocarban (TCs) are broad-spectrum antimicrobials that, until recently, were found in a wide variety of household and personal wash products. Popular with consumers, TCs have not been shown to protect against infectious diseases.

objectivesTo determine whether use of TC-containing wash products reduces incidence of infection in children less than one year of age.

methodsStarting in 2011, we nested a randomized intervention of wash products with and without TCs within a multiethnic birth cohort. Maternal reports of infectious disease symptoms and antibiotic use were collected weekly by automated survey; household visits occurred every four months. Antibiotic prescriptions were identified by medical chart review. Urinary triclosan levels were measured in a participant subset. Differences by intervention group in reported infectious disease (primary outcome) and antibiotic use (secondary outcome) were assessed using mixed effects logistic regression and Fisher's Exact tests, respectively.

resultsInfectious illness occurred in 6% of weeks, with upper respiratory illness the predominant syndrome. Among 60 (45%) TC-exposed and 73 (55%) non-TC-exposed babies, infectious disease reports did not differ in frequency between groups (likelihood ratio test: p = 0.88). Medical visits with antibiotic prescriptions were less common in the TC group than in the non-TC group (7.8% vs. 16.6%, respectively; p = 0.02).

conclusionsAlthough randomization to TC-containing wash products was not associated with decreased infectious disease reports by mothers, TCs were associated with decreased antibiotic prescriptions, suggesting a benefit against bacterial infection. The recent removal of TCs from consumer wash products makes further elucidation of benefits and risks impracticable.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbanilidesDrug PrescriptionsTriclosanAdultCommunicable DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSymptom AssessmentYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbanilidestriclocarbanTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID29953463
PMCPMC6023107
OpenAlexW2810616587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.