Trial reportCardiovascular drugs and therapy2018
Improvement in Left Ventricular Function with Intracoronary Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in a Patient with Anterior Wall ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Trial report in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary Mesenchymal Stem Cell Administration in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Global Panoramic analysis of clinical research in cell therapy: clinical trial landscape, marketed products, and regulatory trends.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy & safety of stem cell therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review & meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Mid- to long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Comparing the effect of bone marrow mono-nuclear cells with mesenchymal stem cells after acute myocardial infarction on improvement of left ventricular function: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Bone mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ovariectomized osteoporotic rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Impact of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on cardiac function and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of clinical studies.Cell transplantationPooled it
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Trial
- Mesenchymal stem cells for recurrent miscarriage.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Limitations in the clinical translation of mesenchymal stromal cells: standardisation, heterogeneity and the recipient.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Changes and Diagnostic Significance of miR-542-3p Expression in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Current perspectives on regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells in alleviating cardiac injuries: Molecular pathways and therapeutic enhancement.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in diseases.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Navigating mesenchymal stem cells doses and delivery routes in heart disease trials: A comprehensive overview.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Stem Cell Therapy for Myocardial Infarction Recovery: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Cardiac Repair and Clinical Outcomes of Stem Cell Therapy in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Tissue-source effect on mesenchymal stem cells as living biodrugs for heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsThe progression and development of congestive heart failure is still considered a large problem despite the existence of revascularization therapies and optimal, state-of-the-art medical services. An acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major cause of congestive heart failure, so researchers are investigating techniques to complement primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolytic therapy to prevent congestive heart failure after AMI.
methodsTwenty-six patients with successful PCI for acute ST-segment elevation anterior wall myocardial infarction were assigned to either a control group (n = 12) or a bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) group (n = 14). The control group received optimum post-infarction treatment, and the BMSC group received intracoronary delivery of autologous BMSC at 1 month after PCI with the optimum medical treatment. The primary endpoint was a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change from baseline to 4-month follow-up, as determined via myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
resultsThe global LVEF at baseline (determined 3.5 ± 1.5 days after PCI) was 35.4 ± 3.0% in the control group and 33.6 ± 4.7% in the BM-MSC group. BMSC transfer enhanced left ventricular systolic function primarily in anterior wall myocardial segments adjacent to the LAD infarcted area. Four months later, via SPECT, global LVEF had increased by 4.8 ± 1.9% in the control group and 8.8 ± 2.9% in the BM-MSC group (p = 0.031). The cell transfer did not increase the risk of adverse clinical events, in-stent restenosis, or proarrhythmic effects. The echocardiographic evaluation also revealed a significant increase in the LVEF value from baseline to the 4-month (9.0 ± 4.7 and 5.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.023) and 12-month (9.9 ± 5.2% and 6.5 ± 2.7%, p = 0.048) follow-up in the BM-MSC group but not in the control group.
conclusionsIntracoronary administration of autologous BM-MSC was tolerable and safe with significant improvement in LVEF at 4-month (SPECT and echocardiography result) and 12-month (echocardiography result only) follow-up in patients with anterior AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.