Evidence mapPaperPMID 29959933Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

A cautionary response to SMFM statement: pharmacological treatment of gestational diabetes.

Linda A Barbour, Christina Scifres, Amy M Valent, Jacob E Friedman, Thomas A Buchanan, Donald Coustan, Kjersti Aagaard, Kent L Thornburg, Patrick M Catalano, Henry L Galan and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Primary Care for Gestational Diabetes: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications from 1991 to 2024.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda A BarbourDivisions of Endocrinology and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: Lynn.Barbour@UCDenver.edu.
Christina ScifresDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Amy M ValentDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Jacob E FriedmanDivisions of Neonatology, Endocrinology, and Reproductive Sciences, Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, Biochemistry, and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Thomas A BuchananDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Donald CoustanDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Kjersti AagaardDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.
Kent L ThornburgDepartment of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Patrick M CatalanoDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Center for Reproductive Health, Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Henry L GalanDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO.
William W HayDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Antonio E FriasDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Kartik ShankarArkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Rebecca A SimmonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Robert G MosesIllawarra Area Health Service, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia.
David A SacksDepartment of Research and Evaluation of Nutrition and Metabolism, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
Mary R LoekenSection on Islet Cell and Regenerative Biology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USArkansas Children's Nutrition Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBrown University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USJoslin Diabetes Center · USKaiser Permanente · USMetroHealth Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SECRETORY TARGETING IN PANCREATIC B CELLSP30DK036836 · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · 1986 to 2025
$12.1M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · 2025 to 2025
$9.1M
PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · 1995 to 2025
$7.7M
Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · 2001 to 2025
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104649NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of oral agents to treat gestational diabetes mellitus remains controversial. Recent recommendations from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine assert that metformin may be a safe first-line alternative to insulin for gestational diabetes mellitus treatment and preferable to glyburide. However, several issues should give pause to the widespread adoption of metformin use during pregnancy. Fetal concentrations of metformin are equal to maternal, and metformin can inhibit growth, suppress mitochondrial respiration, have epigenetic modifications on gene expression, mimic fetal nutrient restriction, and alter postnatal gluconeogenic responses. Because both the placenta and fetus express metformin transporters and exhibit high mitochondrial activity, these properties raise important questions about developmental programming of metabolic disease in offspring. Animal studies have demonstrated that prenatal metformin exposure results in adverse long-term outcomes on body weight and metabolism. Two recent clinical randomized controlled trials in women with gestational diabetes mellitus or polycystic ovary syndrome provide evidence that metformin exposure in utero may produce a metabolic phenotype that increases childhood weight or obesity. These developmental programming effects challenge the conclusion that metformin is equivalent to insulin. Although the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine statement endorsed metformin over glyburide if oral agents are used, there are few studies directly comparing the 2 agents and it is not clear that metformin alone is superior to glyburide. Moreover, it should be noted that prior clinical studies have dosed glyburide in a manner inconsistent with its pharmacokinetic properties, resulting in poor glycemic control and high rates of maternal hypoglycemia. We concur with the American Diabetes Association and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which recommend insulin as the preferred agent, but we believe that it is premature to embrace metformin as equivalent to insulin or superior to glyburide. Due to the uncertainty of the long-term metabolic risks of either metformin or glyburide, we call for carefully controlled studies that optimize oral medication dosing according to their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties in pregnancy, appropriately target medications based on individual patterns of hyperglycemia, and follow the offspring long-term for metabolic risk.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminObstetricsPregnancySocieties, MedicalUnited StatesHypoglycemic AgentsMetformindiabetes in pregnancyglyburideguidelinesmetformin

Identifiers

PMID29959933
PMCPMC6263936
OpenAlexW2811008851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.