Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29960591›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2018

Prognostic impact of HbA1c variability on long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Jun Gu, Jian-An Pan, Yu-Qi Fan, Hui-Li Zhang, Jun-Feng Zhang, Chang-Qian Wang

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun GuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Jian-An PanDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Qi FanDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Hui-Li ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Feng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China.
Chang-Qian WangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. shxkliuxu@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-5117

Funding

Clinical Research Program of 9th People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong university School of Medicine JYLJ017National Nature Science Foundation of China 81670293Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 18411950500Shanghai Shenkang hospital development center 16CR2034B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic impact of long-term glycemic variability on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. We determined and compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) variability and clinical outcomes for patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a prospective longitudinal study.

methodsPatients with HF and T2DM, undergone 3 or more HbA1c determinations during the first 18 months, were then followed for 42 months. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcome was composite endpoints with death and HF hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes for patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF.

resultsOf 902 patients enrolled, 32.2% had HFpEF, 14.5% HFmrEF, and 53.3% HFrEF. During 42 months of follow-up, 270 (29.9%) patients died and 545 (60.4%) patients experienced composite endpoints of death and HF readmission. The risk of all-cause death or composite endpoints was lower for HFpEF than HFrEF. Moreover, higher HbA1c variability was associated with higher all-cause mortality or composite endpoints and HbA1c variability was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality or composite endpoints, regardless of EF.

conclusionsThis prospective longitudinal study showed that the all-cause death and composite events was lower for HFpEF than HFrEF. HbA1c variability was independently and similarly predictive of death or combined endpoints in the three HF phenotypes.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHeart FailureHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTime FactorsBiomarkersGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHeart failureHemoglobin A1c variabilityHospitalizationMortalityType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID29960591
PMCPMC6026342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.