Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29967485›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2018

Multinucleotide mutations cause false inferences of lineage-specific positive selection.

Aarti Venkat, Matthew W Hahn, Joseph W Thornton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Highly Recurrent Multinucleotide Mutations in SARS-CoV-2.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gene loss and relaxed selection ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aarti VenkatDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew W HahnDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Joseph W ThorntonDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. joet1@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-6994

Funding

Mechanisms for the evolution of novel DNA specificity in a transcription factor fR01GM104397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THORNTON, JOSEPH W · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Deep characterization of the sequence space and evolutionary trajectories of reconstructed ancestral proteins - Resubmission 01R01GM121931 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THORNTON, JOSEPH W · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104397NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic tests of adaptive evolution, such as the widely used branch-site test (BST), assume that nucleotide substitutions occur singly and independently. Recent research has shown that errors at adjacent sites often occur during DNA replication, and the resulting multinucleotide mutations (MNMs) are overwhelmingly likely to be non-synonymous. To evaluate whether the BST misinterprets sequence patterns produced by MNMs as false support for positive selection, we analysed two genome-scale datasets-one from mammals and one from flies. We found that codons with multiple differences account for virtually all the support for lineage-specific positive selection in the BST. Simulations under conditions derived from these alignments but without positive selection show that realistic rates of MNMs cause a strong and systematic bias towards false inferences of selection. This bias is sufficient under empirically derived conditions to produce false positive inferences as often as the BST infers positive selection from the empirical data. Although some genes with BST-positive results may have evolved adaptively, the test cannot distinguish sequence patterns produced by authentic positive selection from those caused by neutral fixation of MNMs. Many published inferences of adaptive evolution using this technique may therefore be artefacts of model violation caused by unincorporated neutral mutational processes. We introduce a model that incorporates MNMs and may help to ameliorate this bias.

Indexed as

MutationSelection, GeneticAnimalsDirected Molecular EvolutionDrosophilaNucleotidesPhylogenyNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID29967485
PMCPMC6093625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.