Trial reportParticle and fibre toxicology2018
The effects of facemasks on airway inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in healthy young adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study.
Trial report in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath Condensate: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of respirators to reduce fine particulate matter exposures on blood pressure and heart rate variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2022Pooled it
- Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Effect of Traffic-Related Air Pollution : A Crossover Trial of In-Vehicle Filtration.Annals of internal medicine · 2023Trial
- Acute Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Effects of Near-Roadway Exposures With and Without N95 Respirators.American journal of hypertension · 2019Trial
- Narrative review of wildfire smoke interventions: considering the unique vulnerabilities of children and pregnant individuals.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Review
- Impact of Lignite Combustion Air Pollution on Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation Incidence in Western Macedonia, Greece.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- [Mitigating the Health Effects of Particulate Matter: A Narrative Review of Intervention Studies].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2025Review
- Atmosphere particulate matter and respiratory diseases during COVID-19 in Korea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Physiological impacts of atmospheric pollution: Effects of environmental air pollution on exercise.Physiological reports · 2024Review
- Interventions to reduce the impact of outdoor air pollution on asthma: A systematic review.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Pollution and cardiovascular health: A contemporary review of morbidity and implications for planetary health.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Review
- Overview of particulate air pollution and human health in China: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2022Review
- Changes in the Mean and Variance of the Numbers of Medical Visits for Allergic Diseases before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Recommendations of Controlling and Preventing Acute Health Risks of Fine Particulate Matter Pollution - China, 2021.China CDC weekly · 2022Article
- The cardiovascular effects of air pollution: Prevention and reversal by pharmacological agents.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Qualitative fitting characteristics of filtering face-piece respirators on Iranian people.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2020Article
- Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature.Current environmental health reports · 2020Review
- Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter?Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFacemasks are increasingly worn during air pollution episodes in China, but their protective effects are poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the filtration efficiencies of N95 facemasks and the cardiopulmonary benefits associated with wearing facemasks during episodes of pollution.
resultsWe measured the filtration efficiencies of particles in ambient air of six types of N95 facemasks with a manikin headform. The most effective one was used in a double-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study, involving 15 healthy young adults, conducted during 2 days of severe pollution in Beijing, China. Subjects were asked to walk along a busy-traffic road for 2 h wearing authentic or sham N95 facemasks. Clinical tests were performed four times to determine changes in the levels of biomarkers of airway inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress within 24 h after exposure. The facemasks removed 48-75% of number concentrations of ambient air particles between 5.6 and 560 nm in diameter. After adjustments for multiple comparison, the exhaled nitric oxide level and the levels of interleukin-1α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 in exhaled breath condensate increased significantly in all subjects; however, the increases in those wearing authentic facemasks were statistically significantly lower than in the sham group. No significant between-group difference was evident in the urinary creatinine-corrected malondialdehyde level. In arterial stiffness indicators, the ejection duration of subjects wearing authentic facemasks was higher after exposure compared to the sham group; no significant between-group difference was found in augmentation pressure or the augmentation index.
conclusionsIn young healthy adults, N95 facemasks partially reduced acute particle-associated airway inflammation, but neither systemic oxidative stress nor endothelial dysfunction improved significantly. The clinical significance of these findings long-term remains to be determined.
trial registrationThe trial registration number (TRN) for this study is ChiCTR1800016099 , which was retrospectively registered on May 11, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.