ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2018
Women's health: making cardiovascular disease real.
Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhen patients are seen for persistent chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, the physician must decide if the symptoms are due to myocardial ischemia in order to guide treatment. RECENT
findingsRecent findings indicate that ischemia due to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and an adverse prognosis. Therapeutic probe trials suggest that antiatherosclerotic and anti-ischemic therapeutic strategies may be useful. A large randomized clinical trial of high-intensity statin, maximally tolerated angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and low-dose aspirin (WARRIOR NCT#03417388) is in progress. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of CMD should be considered in patients with persistent angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia and normal coronary angiogram. Because of the associated adverse prognosis of CMD , conservative empiric treatment or further diagnostic evaluation of the coronary microvasculature can be performed. Diagnosis involves the measurement of coronary blood blow in response to a vasodilator agent invasively or noninvasively. Treatment of CMD can include the use of traditional antianginal and antiatherosclerotic medications. Clinical trials are needed to assess therapeutic strategies on the outcomes of cardiovascular disease and quality of life, in order to develop evidence-based guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.