Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987755›Full record

Observational studyJournal of endocrinological investigation2019

Adjustment of insulin doses when switching from glargine 100 U/ml or detemir to degludec: an observational study.

C Lualdi, A Silverii, I Dicembrini, L Pala, M Monami, E Mannucci

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Insulin doses requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes using glargine U300 or degludec in routine clinical practice.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2021
    Article
  3. Switching Patients with Type 1 Diabetes to Insulin Degludec from Other Basal Insulins: Real-World Data of Effectiveness and Safety.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C LualdiDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy.
A SilveriiDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy.
I DicembriniDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy.
L PalaDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy.
M MonamiDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy.
E MannucciDiabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50141, Florence, Italy. edoardo.mannucci@unifi.it.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDegludec is a long-acting insulin with a longer duration of action and a greater day-to-day reproducibility of absorption in comparison with previous long-acting insulin formulations. The aim is the definition of the change in insulin needs in patients switching from detemir/glargine to degludec in real-life conditions.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort observational study, all outpatients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, starting therapy with degludec insulin-after a prior treatment with either detemir or glargine insulin for at least 6 months-were included.

resultsThe analysis was performed on 266 patients, 172 and 96 with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The equations describing the relationship between baseline and follow-up doses of basal insulin (6 months) were Y = 3.39 + 0.78X and Y = 0.44 + 0.69X, in patients receiving detemir/glargine either once or twice daily, respectively (Y = degludec dose at 6 months and X = basal insulin dose at switch). The corresponding equations for prandial insulin doses were y = 1.83 + 0.83*x and y = 2.85 + 0.80*x for those on pre-switch once or twice-daily basal insulin, respectively. In type 2 diabetes, the switch was associated with a reduction of basal insulin doses only in those with a prior twice-daily treatment with basal insulin. The reduction of prandial insulin reached statistical significance only in patients previously treated with basal insulin once daily.

conclusionsThe present results provide a suggestion for a simple method for the adjustment of basal and prandial insulin doses in type 1 diabetic patients, switching from glargine or detemir to degludec.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingAdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingBasal insulinDegludecInsulinPrandial insulinType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29987755
OpenAlexW2830362922

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.