Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988624›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Amyloid-β, Tau, and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Older Individuals: Examining the Necessity to Adjust for Biomarker Status in Normative Data.

Isabelle Bos, Stephanie J B Vos, Willemijn J Jansen, Rik Vandenberghe, Silvy Gabel, Ainara Estanga, Mirian Ecay-Torres, Jori Tomassen, Anouk den Braber, Alberto Lleó and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Isabelle BosDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Stephanie J B VosDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Willemijn J JansenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rik VandenbergheUniversity Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
Silvy GabelLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ainara EstangaCenter for Research and Advanced Therapies CITA-Alzheimer Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain.
Mirian Ecay-TorresCenter for Research and Advanced Therapies CITA-Alzheimer Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain.
Jori TomassenAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anouk den BraberAlzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alberto LleóDepartment of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel SalaDepartment of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Anders WallinSection for Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Petronella KettunenSection for Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
José L MolinuevoAlzheimer's Disease & Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hopsital Clínic Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena RamiAlzheimer's Disease & Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hopsital Clínic Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Gaël ChetelatInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR-S U1237, Université de Caen-Normandie GIP Cyceron, Caen, France.
Vincent de la SayetteInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1077, Université de Caen Normandie Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Caen, France.
Magda Tsolaki1st Department of Neurology University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Yvonne Freund-LeviDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Caring Sciences and Society (NVS) Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter JohannsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Gerald P NovakJanssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development Titusville, NJ, United States.
Inez RamakersDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Frans R VerheyDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Pieter Jelle VisserDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau affected cognition in cognitively normal (CN) individuals, and whether norms for neuropsychological tests based on biomarker-negative individuals would improve early detection of dementia. We included 907 CN individuals from 8 European cohorts and from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative. All individuals were aged above 40, had Aβ status and neuropsychological data available. Linear mixed models were used to assess the associations of Aβ and tau with five neuropsychological tests assessing memory (immediate and delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT), verbal fluency (Verbal Fluency Test, VFT), attention and executive functioning (Trail Making Test, TMT, part A and B). All test except the VFT were associated with Aβ status and this influence was augmented by age. We found no influence of tau on any of the cognitive tests. For the AVLT Immediate and Delayed recall and the TMT part A and B, we calculated norms in individuals without Aβ pathology (Aβ- norms), which we validated in an independent memory-clinic cohort by comparing their predictive accuracy to published norms. For memory tests, the Aβ- norms rightfully identified an additional group of individuals at risk of dementia. For non-memory test we found no difference. We confirmed the relationship between Aβ and cognition in cognitively normal individuals. The Aβ- norms for memory tests in combination with published norms improve prognostic accuracy of dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamyloid-betacognitionneuropsychological examinationnormative datatau

Identifiers

PMID29988624
PMCPMC6027060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.