ReviewEuropean radiology2019
Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.
Review in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on MR imaging prior to fertility-sparing treatments in patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- Imaging in pelvic exenteration-a multidisciplinary practice guide from the ESGAR-SAR-ESUR-PelvEx collaborative group.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- Apparent Diffusion Coefficient on Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict the Prognosis of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Pooled it
- Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2020Pooled it
- ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.European radiology · 2026Review
- Impact of deep-learning image reconstruction on multiplexed sensitivity encoding diffusion-weighted imaging in the female pelvis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Research trends and emerging themes of magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Toward reproducible metabolic tumor volume quantification in endometrial cancer: optimizing [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT tumor segmentation methods.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Insights into endometrial cancer management: a comprehensive guide through multimodality imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Apparent diffusion coefficient values of lymph nodes in endometrial cancer: can they predict lymph node metastases? - a retrospective study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Observational
- Multireader diagnostic performance of MRI-based Node-RADS for pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.European radiology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Explainable MRI-Based Habitat Radiomics Model for Predicting p53-Abnormal Endometrial Cancer: A Multicentre Feasibility Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond size criteria: Node-RADS improves reliability in MRI-based lymph node classification for endometrial cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- [Cancers · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk assessment of endometrial cancer using histogram analysis of weighted and quantitative MRI images.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer: tips for MRI interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Updated ESUR Guidelines for Endometrial Cancer: integrating MRI with the 2023 FIGO Staging Revolution.European radiology · 2026Review
- Predicting aggressive disease and poor outcome in endometrial cancer using preoperative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo update the 2009 ESUR endometrial cancer guidelines and propose strategies to standardize image acquisition, interpretation and reporting for endometrial cancer staging with MRI.
methodsThe published evidence-based data and the opinion of experts were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and formed the basis for these consensus guidelines. The responses of the experts to 81 questions regarding the details of patient preparation, MR imaging protocol, image interpretation and reporting were collected, analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if at least 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if less than 80% consensus among experts).
resultsConsensus regarding patient preparation, MR image acquisition, interpretation and reporting was determined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A tailored MR imaging protocol and a standardized report were recommended.
conclusionsThese consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for endometrial cancer staging with MRI. KEY POINTS: • MRI is recommended for initial staging of endometrial cancer. • MR imaging protocol should be tailored based on the risk of lymph node metastases. • Myometrial invasion is best assessed using combined axial-oblique T2WI, DWI and contrast-enhanced imaging. • The mnemonic "Clinical and MRI Critical TEAM" summarizes key elements of the standardized report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29995239What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.