Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30045859›Full record

ArticleBiology open2018

Cell tracking

Marcus May, Bernd Denecke, Timm Schroeder, Magdalena Götz, Andreas Faissner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineered Biomimetic Neural Stem Cell Niche.Current stem cell reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus MayDepartment for Cell Morphology and Molecular Neurobiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
Bernd DeneckeAachen Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Timm SchroederDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Magdalena GötzPhysiological Genomics, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg/Martinsried, Germany.
Andreas FaissnerDepartment for Cell Morphology and Molecular Neurobiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany andreas.faissner@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-8259
Ruhr University Bochum · DEETH Zurich · CHMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of astrocytes during the development of the mammalian spinal cord is poorly understood. Previously, we have shown that the glycoprotein of the extracellular matrix (ECM) tenascin-C (Tnc) modulates the expression territories of the patterning genes Nkx6.1 and Nkx2.2 in the developing ventral spinal cord, tunes the responsiveness of neural stem/progenitor cells towards the cytokines FGF2 and EGF and thereby promotes astrocyte maturation. In order to obtain further mechanistic insight into these processes, we have compared embryonic day-15 spinal cord neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from wild-type and

Indexed as

Cell lineageExtracellular matrixGliogenesisGrowth factor responsivenessStem cell nicheTenascin-CTime-lapse video microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30045859
PMCPMC6078350
OpenAlexW2884332828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.