Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30053188›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2018

Participatory Women's Groups with Cash Transfers Can Increase Dietary Diversity and Micronutrient Adequacy during Pregnancy, whereas Women's Groups with Food Transfers Can Increase Equity in Intrahousehold Energy Allocation.

Helen A Harris-Fry, Puskar Paudel, Tom Harrisson, Niva Shrestha, Sonali Jha, B James Beard, Andrew Copas, Bhim P Shrestha, Dharma S Manandhar, Anthony M de L Costello and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Helen A Harris-FryLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Puskar PaudelMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tom HarrissonInstitute for Global Health.
Niva ShresthaLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sonali JhaMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
B James BeardLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew CopasGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bhim P ShresthaMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dharma S ManandharMother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anthony M de L CostelloInstitute for Global Health.
Mario Cortina-BorjaGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naomi M SavilleInstitute for Global Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is scarce evidence on the impacts of food transfers, cash transfers, or women's groups on food sharing, dietary intakes, or nutrition during pregnancy, when nutritional needs are elevated. Objective: This study measured the effects of 3 pregnancy-focused nutrition interventions on intrahousehold food allocation, dietary adequacy, and maternal nutritional status in Nepal. Methods: Interventions tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 75964374) were "Participatory Learning and Action" (PLA) monthly women's groups, PLA with transfers of 10 kg fortified flour ("Super Cereal"), and PLA plus transfers of 750 Nepalese rupees (∼US$7.5) to pregnant women. Control clusters received usual government services. Primary outcomes were Relative Dietary Energy Adequacy Ratios (RDEARs) between pregnant women and male household heads and pregnant women and their mothers-in-law. Diets were measured by repeated 24-h dietary recalls. Results: Relative to control, RDEARs between pregnant women and their mothers-in-law were 12% higher in the PLA plus food arm (log-RDEAR coefficient = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.21; P = 0.014), but 10% lower in the PLA-only arm between pregnant women and male household heads (-0.11; 95% CI: -0.19, -0.02; P = 0.020). In all interventions, pregnant women's energy intakes did not improve, but odds of pregnant women consuming iron-folate supplements were 2.5-4.6 times higher, odds of pregnant women consuming more animal-source foods than the household head were 1.7-2.4 times higher, and midupper arm circumference was higher relative to control. Dietary diversity was 0.4 food groups higher in the PLA plus cash arm than in the control arm. Conclusions: All interventions improved maternal diets and nutritional status in pregnancy. PLA women's groups with food transfers increased equity in energy allocation, whereas PLA with cash improved dietary diversity. PLA alone improved diets, but effects were mixed. Scale-up of these interventions in marginalized populations is a policy option, but researchers should find ways to increase adherence to interventions. This trial was registered at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN 75964374.

Indexed as

DietMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional RequirementsPregnant PeopleAdultDietary SupplementsEnergy IntakeFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFlourFood AssistanceFood, FortifiedHumansMaleMicronutrientsNepalMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID30053188
PMCPMC6118166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.