Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30057860›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Mitochondrial genomes organization in alloplasmic lines of sunflower (

Maksim S Makarenko, Igor V Kornienko, Kirill V Azarin, Alexander V Usatov, Maria D Logacheva, Nicolay V Markin, Vera A Gavrilova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maksim S Makarenko *Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-3874
Igor V KornienkoSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Kirill V Azarin *Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Alexander V UsatovSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Maria D LogachevaMoscow State University, Belozersky Institute of Physical and Chemical Biology, Moscow, Russia.
Nicolay V MarkinSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Vera A GavrilovaThe N.I. Vavilov All Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is a common phenotype in higher plants, that is often associated with rearrangements in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and is widely used to produce hybrid seeds in a variety of valuable crop species. Investigation of the CMS phenomenon promotes understanding of fundamental issues of nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions in the ontogeny of higher plants. In the present study, we analyzed the structural changes in mitochondrial genomes of three alloplasmic lines of sunflower (

methodsThe NGS sequencing,

resultsThe mtDNA of the HA89 fertile line was almost identical to the HA412 line (NC_023337). The comparative analysis of HA89 fertile and CMS (PET1) analog mitochondrial genomes revealed 11,852 bp inversion, 4,732 bp insertion, 451 bp deletion and 18 variant sites. In the mtDNA of HA89 (PET2) CMS line we determined 27.5 kb and 106.5 kb translocations, 711 bp and 3,780 bp deletions, as well as, 5,050 bp and 15,885 bp insertions. There are also 83 polymorphic sites in the PET2 mitochondrial genome, as compared with the fertile line. DISCUSSION: The observed mitochondrial reorganizations in PET1 resulted in only one new open reading frame formation (

Indexed as

Cytoplasmic male sterilityMitochondrial genome rearrangementsmtDNA structureSunflower

Identifiers

PMID30057860
PMCPMC6061164

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.