Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102366›Full record

SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2019

Computational resources associating diseases with genotypes, phenotypes and exposures.

Wenliang Zhang, Haiyue Zhang, Huan Yang, Miaoxin Li, Zhi Xie, Weizhong Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenliang ZhangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Haiyue ZhangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Huan YangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Miaoxin LiZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhi XieState Key Lab of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 500040, China.
Weizhong LiZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The causes of a disease and its therapies are not only related to genotypes, but also associated with other factors, including phenotypes, environmental exposures, drugs and chemical molecules. Distinguishing disease-related factors from many neutral factors is critical as well as difficult. Over the past two decades, bioinformaticians have developed many computational resources to integrate the omics data and discover associations among these factors. However, researchers and clinicians are experiencing difficulties in choosing appropriate resources from hundreds of relevant databases and software tools. Here, in order to assist the researchers and clinicians, we systematically review the public computational resources of human diseases related to genotypes, phenotypes, environment factors, drugs and chemical exposures. We briefly describe the development history of these computational resources, followed by the details of the relevant databases and software tools. We finally conclude with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunities as well as prospects on this topic.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEnvironmental ExposureGenotypePhenotypeHumansdatabasedisease phenotypeenvironmental exposuregenotypesoftware toolweb platform

Identifiers

PMID30102366
PMCPMC6954426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.