Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104207›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2018

Analysis of RNA nearest neighbor parameters reveals interdependencies and quantifies the uncertainty in RNA secondary structure prediction.

Jeffrey Zuber, B Joseph Cabral, Iain McFadyen, David M Mauger, David H Mathews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. StructRMDB: A database of RNA modification sites that affect RNA secondary structure.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  11. Estimating RNA Secondary Structure Folding Free Energy Changes with efn2.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Self-amplifying mRNA-Based Vaccine Technology and Its Mode of Action.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey ZuberDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
B Joseph CabralComputational Sciences, Moderna Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141, USA.
Iain McFadyenComputational Sciences, Moderna Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141, USA.
David M MaugerComputational Sciences, Moderna Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141, USA.
David H MathewsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

Funding

Supporting RNAstructure: Software for RNA AnalysisR01GM076485 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MATHEWS, DAVID H. · 2006 to 2021
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA secondary structure prediction is often used to develop hypotheses about structure-function relationships for newly discovered RNA sequences, to identify unknown functional RNAs, and to design sequences. Secondary structure prediction methods typically use a thermodynamic model that estimates the free energy change of possible structures based on a set of nearest neighbor parameters. These parameters were derived from optical melting experiments of small model oligonucleotides. This work aims to better understand the precision of structure prediction. Here, the experimental errors in optical melting experiments were propagated to errors in the derived nearest neighbor parameter values and then to errors in RNA secondary structure prediction. To perform this analysis, the optical melting experimental values were systematically perturbed within the estimates of experimental error and alternative sets of nearest neighbor parameters were then derived from these error-bounded values. Secondary structure predictions using either the perturbed or reference parameter sets were then compared. This work demonstrated that the precision of RNA secondary structure prediction is more robust than suggested by previous work based on perturbation of the nearest neighbor parameters. This robustness is due to correlations between parameters. Additionally, this work identified weaknesses in the parameter derivation that makes accurate assessment of parameter uncertainty difficult. Considerations for experimental design are provided to mitigate these weaknesses are provided.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationRNA FoldingBase PairingRNAThermodynamicsRNARNA folding free energy changeRNA structure predictionRNA thermodynamicssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID30104207
PMCPMC6191722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.