Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30115772›Full record

ReviewLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2018

Beyond simple tests of value: measuring addiction as a heterogeneous disease of computation-specific valuation processes.

Brian M Sweis, Mark J Thomas, A David Redish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Computation to Clinic.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. An optimized procedure for robust volitional cocaine intake in mice.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian M SweisGraduate Program in Neuroscience and Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-5824
Mark J ThomasDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5721-5350
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-9072

Funding

Testing hybrid theories of action-selectionR01MH112688 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
Relating episodic memory and episodic future thinking in hippocampusR01MH080318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$3.7M
Synaptic Plasticity in Animal Models of AddictionR01DA019666 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
The covert expectation of reward during deliberationR01DA030672 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Probing Neural Circuit Plasticity in Addiction RelapseK02DA035459 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THOMAS, MARK JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$511k
Optogenetic modulation of decision-making circuitry in mouse models of addictionF30DA043326 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SWEIS, BRIAN MUSA · 2017 to 2020
$139k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA043326NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA035459NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019666NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030672NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080318NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addiction is considered to be a neurobiological disorder of learning and memory because addiction is capable of producing lasting changes in the brain. Recovering addicts chronically struggle with making poor decisions that ultimately lead to relapse, suggesting a view of addiction also as a neurobiological disorder of decision-making information processing. How the brain makes decisions depends on how decision-making processes access information stored as memories in the brain. Advancements in circuit-dissection tools and recent theories in neuroeconomics suggest that neurally dissociable valuation processes access distinct memories differently, and thus are uniquely susceptible as the brain changes during addiction. If addiction is to be considered a neurobiological disorder of memory, and thus decision-making, the heterogeneity with which information is both stored and processed must be taken into account in addiction studies. Addiction etiology can vary widely from person to person. We propose that addiction is not a single disease, nor simply a disorder of learning and memory, but rather a collection of symptoms of heterogeneous neurobiological diseases of distinct circuit-computation-specific decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyBehavior, AddictiveBrainDecision MakingHumansMemoryNerve NetNeuronal PlasticitySubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30115772
PMCPMC6097760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.