Evidence mapPaperPMID 30136124Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2018

Perioperative care of cardiac patient's candidate for non-cardiac surgery: a critical appraisal of emergent evidence and international guidelines.

Felice Gragnano, Davide Cattano, Paolo Calabrò

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felice GragnanoDivision of Clinical Cardiology, A.O.R.N. Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy.
Davide CattanoMcGovern Medical School, UTHealth at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Davide.Cattano@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3286-2700
Paolo CalabròDivision of Clinical Cardiology, A.O.R.N. Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITThe University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perioperative management of a cardiac-patient candidate to non-cardiac surgery (NCS) remains a topic of considerable debate. In recent years, the overall tendency from professional societies has been to delineate how to identify and manage high-risk patients following the best evidence. However, significant concerns persist, especially in the care of intermediate-risk patients (also labeled at "acceptable" risk), who may not fit into the categories of "completely healthy" or "critically ill", but that might still encounter dramatic (and unexpected) perioperative events. The specific interest and main goal of this expert viewpoint pertains to the care of cardiac patients scheduled for NCS, addressing central questions of real-life clinical care that practicing anesthesiologists and cardiologists face daily, discussing recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESC/ESA), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines. The viewpoint aims to discuss few of the important topics pertaining perioperative assessment and management: type of NCS and perioperative cardiac events, risk prediction including testing, and perioperative management of cardiac therapy. The fact that cardiac adverse events have reduced in number mostly due to better preoperative management and prevention should not prompt a reduction in clinical evaluations. While debate remains pertaining the most appropriate way to evaluate patients for NCS within international societies, a comprehensive approach-evaluation best recognized to assess functional and heart status, should be maintained, keeping into consideration the surgical procedure and global health management.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicHeart DiseasesHumansInternationalityMass ScreeningPerioperative CareRisk AssessmentSurgical Procedures, OperativeCardiac patient for non-cardiac surgeryPerioperative managementPre-anesthesia evaluationPreoperative optimization

Identifiers

PMID30136124
OpenAlexW2888066455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.