ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018
Pharmacodynamics and arteriovenous difference of intravenous naloxone in healthy volunteers exposed to remifentanil.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02405988 (Pharmacodynamics and Arteriovenous Differences of Naloxone in Healthy Participants Exposed to an Opioid), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacodynamics and Arteriovenous Differences of Naloxone in Healthy Participants Exposed to an Opioid
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- PBPK-PD model for predicting morphine pharmacokinetics, CNS effects and naloxone antagonism in humans.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Naloxone.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Are carfentanil and acrylfentanyl naloxone resistant?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Comparison of the effects of target-controlled infusion-remifentanil/midazolam and manual fentanyl/midazolam administration on patient parameters in dental procedures.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2022Article
- The pharmacokinetic interaction between nasally administered naloxone and the opioid remifentanil in human volunteers.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePharmacodynamic studies of naloxone require opioid agonism. Steady state condition may be achieved by remifentanil TCI (target controlled infusion). Opioid agonism can be measured by pupillometry. It is not known whether there are arteriovenous concentration differences for naloxone. The aim was thus to further develop a model for studying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic aspects of naloxone and to explore whether a significant arteriovenous concentration difference for naloxone in humans was present.
methodsRelevant authorities approved this study. Healthy volunteers (n = 12) were given 1.0 mg intravenous (IV) naloxone after steady state opioid agonism was obtained by TCI of remifentanil (1.3 ng/ml). Opioid effect was measured by pupillometry. Arterial and venous samples were collected simultaneously before and for 2 h after naloxone administration for quantification of naloxone and remifentanil.
resultsArterial remifentanil was in steady state at 12 min. One milligram IV naloxone reversed the effect of remifentanil to 93% of pre-opioid pupil-size within 4 min. The estimated duration of antagonism was 118 min. At that time, the concentration of naloxone was 0.51 ng/ml. The time course of arterial and venous serum concentrations for naloxone was similar, although arterial AUC (area under the curve) was slightly lower (94%) than the venous AUC (p = 0.03). There were no serious adverse events.
conclusionOnset of reversal by IV naloxone was rapid and lasted 118 min. The minimum effective concentration was 0.5 ng/ml. Using TCI remifentanil to obtain a steady-state opioid agonism may be a useful tool to compare new naloxone products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.