Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144059›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Jinghong Xu, Tingting Bi, Jing Wu, Fanzhu Meng, Kun Wang, Jiawei Hu, Xiao Han, Jiping Zhang, Xiaoming Zhou, Les Keniston and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Development of Multisensory Integration at the Neuronal Level.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Integrating Visual Information into the Auditory Cortex Promotes Sound Discrimination through Choice-Related Multisensory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinghong XuKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Tingting BiKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jing WuKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Fanzhu MengKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Kun WangKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jiawei HuKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao HanKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jiping ZhangKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoming ZhouKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Les KenistonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, USA.
Liping YuKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (East China Normal University), School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9771-5971

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31300910National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31400944Shanghai Natural Science Foundation 14ZR1411500The National Basic Research Program of China 2013CB329504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsIt has been known for some time that sensory information of one type can bias the spatial perception of another modality. However, there is a lack of evidence of this occurring in individual neurons. In the present study, we found that the spatial receptive field of superior colliculus multisensory neurons could be dynamically shifted by a preceding stimulus in a different modality. The extent to which the receptive field shifted was dependent on both temporal and spatial gaps between the preceding and following stimuli, as well as the salience of the preceding stimulus. This result provides a neural mechanism that could underlie the process of cross-modal spatial calibration. ABSTRACT: Psychophysical studies have shown that the different senses can be spatially entrained by each other. This can be observed in certain phenomena, such as ventriloquism, in which a visual stimulus can attract the perceived location of a spatially discordant sound. However, the neural mechanism underlying this cross-modal spatial recalibration has remained unclear, as has whether it takes place dynamically. We explored these issues in multisensory neurons of the cat superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain structure that involves both cross-modal and sensorimotor integration. Sequential cross-modal stimulation showed that the preceding stimulus can shift the receptive field (RF) of the lagging response. This cross-modal spatial calibration took place in both auditory and visual RFs, although auditory RFs shifted slightly more. By contrast, if a preceding stimulus was from the same modality, it failed to induce a similarly substantial RF shift. The extent of the RF shift was dependent on both temporal and spatial gaps between the preceding and following stimuli, as well as the salience of the preceding stimulus. A narrow time gap and high stimulus salience were able to induce larger RF shifts. In addition, when both visual and auditory stimuli were presented simultaneously, a substantial RF shift toward the location-fixed stimulus was also induced. These results, taken together, reveal an online cross-modal process and reflect the details of the organization of SC inter-sensory spatial calibration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PerceptionCatsEvoked PotentialsMaleSuperior ColliculiVisual Perceptioncross-modal spatial calibrationmultisensory integrationreceptive fieldSuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID30144059
PMCPMC6187038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.