Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144295›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2019

Outbreaks of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella Choleraesuis in wild boars piglets from central-western Spain.

María Gil Molino, David Risco Pérez, Pilar Gonçalves Blanco, Pedro Fernandez Llario, Alberto Quesada Molina, Alfredo García Sánchez, Jesús María Cuesta Gerveno, Luis Gómez Gordo, Francisco Eduardo Martín Cano, Remigio Pérez Martínez and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of the Occurrence ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. First Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What WGS Reveals aboutMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  15. AJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  16. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistances ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Gil MolinoFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Patología Infecciosa, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0797-3377
David Risco PérezInnovación en Gestión y Conservación de Ungulados S.L., Cáceres, Spain.
Pilar Gonçalves BlancoInnovación en Gestión y Conservación de Ungulados S.L., Cáceres, Spain.
Pedro Fernandez LlarioInnovación en Gestión y Conservación de Ungulados S.L., Cáceres, Spain.
Alberto Quesada MolinaFacultad de Veterinaria, Departamento de Bioquimica, Biologia Molecular y Genetica, Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Alfredo García SánchezÁrea de Producción Animal, CICYTEX-La Orden, Badajoz, Spain.
Jesús María Cuesta GervenoFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica, Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Luis Gómez GordoFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica, Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Francisco Eduardo Martín CanoFacultad de Enfermería y Terapia Ocupacional, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres, Spain.
Remigio Pérez MartínezFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Patología Infecciosa, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Elisa Varela FernándezFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Patología Infecciosa, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Joaquín Rey PérezFacultad de Veterinaria, Unidad de Patología Infecciosa, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Universidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

Junta de Extremadura y Fondo Social Europeo TA13003Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PTQ14-06663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis is the aetiological agent of swine paratyphoid being a highly invasive zoonotic pathogen. Wild boar natural populations are experiencing a demographical expansion as well as some farms are breeding this species to release for hunting with management sometimes identical to that of domestic pigs, including supplementation, grouping, and antibiotic treatments. This situation increases the chance of contact between wild boars and livestock, and potentially induces stress, with different sanitary consequences. The present work aims to describe the clinical features of recent outbreaks caused by S. Choleraesuis in wild boar from central-western Spain, as well as the antimicrobial resistance and phylogenetic relationships of isolates involved. 28 strains of S. Choleraesuis were isolated from 28 different wild boars belonging to 10 different game states located in central western Spain and submitted to the Clinical Veterinary Hospital (CVH) of the University of Extremadura. Samples were taken from different organs and cultured according to the ISO 6579:2002 procedure. Suspicious colonies were identified by PCR and antimicrobial resistance was evaluated by disc diffusion susceptibility test and the presence of the main resistance genes as well as 18 plasmid replicons frequently found among the Enterobacteriaceae was verified by PCR. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis was applied to determine the genetic relationship between isolates. The outbreaks under study were characterized by high mortality (35%-84%) and a septicaemic presentation. S. Choleraesuis was isolated from all the wild boars analysed, and 26 of the 28 isolates presented resistance to at least one antibiotic. The predominant resistances found were against sulphonamide, streptomycin, tetracycline, and doxicicline and sul1, strA-strB, and tetA were the most prevalent resistance genes among isolates. 10 strains carried FIIA, FIB+H/1 or FIIA+H/1 plasmids. PFGE classified the isolates into four different profiles, grouped into two clusters. This results show that prevention against S. Choleraesuis must be considered in the sanitary programs of the wild boar breeders.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisease OutbreaksDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSpainSwineSwine DiseasesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceepidemiologySalmonella Choleraesuiswild boar

Identifiers

PMID30144295
PMCPMC7168558
OpenAlexW2888421603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.