ReviewCurrent pathobiology reports2015
Emerging Imaging Modalities in Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Current pathobiology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodistribution studies for cell therapy products: Current status and issues.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Nanotechnology for Cancer Imaging: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Opportunities.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2021Review
- Molecular Imaging and Non-molecular Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Thrombosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- In Vivo Tracking of Tissue Engineered Constructs.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Radionuclide Imaging of Atherothrombotic Diseases.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2019Article
- Multimodality Imaging Approaches for Evaluating Traumatic Extremity Injuries: Implications for Military Medicine.Advances in wound care · 2017Review
- Novel Applications of Radionuclide Imaging in Peripheral Vascular Disease.Cardiology clinics · 2016Review
- The role of molecular imaging in the evaluation of myocardial and peripheral angiogenesis.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2015Review
- Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in Cardiac Regeneration.Current cardiovascular imaging reportsReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of regenerative medicine has experienced considerable growth in recent years as the translation of pre-clinical biomaterials and cell- and gene-based therapies begin to reach clinical application. Until recently, the ability to monitor the serial responses to therapeutic treatments has been limited to post-mortem tissue analyses. With improvements in existing imaging modalities and the emergence of hybrid imaging systems, it is now possible to combine information related to structural remodeling with associated molecular events using non-invasive imaging. This review summarizes the established and emerging imaging modalities that are available for in vivo monitoring of clinical regenerative medicine therapies and discusses the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.