ReviewClinical and translational imaging2018
SPECT vs. PET in cardiac innervation imaging: clash of the titans.
Review in Clinical and translational imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neuronal imaging in cardiology: 123I-Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Novel F-18-labeled Tracers of Sympathetic Function for Improved Risk Stratification and Clinical Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Efficacy ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular imaging along the heart-kidney axis.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Effects of Lipid Lowering Medications on Myocardial Blood Flow, Inflammation, and Sympathetic Nerve Activity Using Nuclear Techniques.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Radionuclide Imaging of Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses to Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Personalized prediction of mode of cardiac death in heart failure using supervised machine learning in the context of cardiac innervation imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- [18F]FDG-labelled stem cell PET imaging in different route of administrations and multiple animal species.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- I-123-MIBG cardiac innervation imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Cardiac innervation imaging as a risk stratification tool for potential device therapy candidates.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Ventricular Distribution Pattern of the Novel Sympathetic Nerve PET RadiotracerScientific reports · 2019Article
- The next era of renal radionuclide imaging: novel PET radiotracers.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- Moving into the next era of PET myocardial perfusion imaging: introduction of novelThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aim to provide an overview of the conventional single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and emerging positron emission tomography (PET) catecholamine analogue tracers for assessing myocardial nerve integrity, in particular focusing on
resultsIncreasingly, the cardiac sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is being studied by non-invasive molecular imaging approaches. Forming the backbone of myocardial SNS imaging, the norepinephrine (NE) transporter at the sympathetic nerve terminal plays a crucial role for visualizing denervated myocardium: in particular, the single-photon-emitting NE analogue
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.