Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30166351›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical genetics2018

Multitrait genome association analysis identifies new susceptibility genes for human anthropometric variation in the GCAT cohort.

Iván Galván-Femenía, Mireia Obón-Santacana, David Piñeyro, Marta Guindo-Martinez, Xavier Duran, Anna Carreras, Raquel Pluvinet, Juan Velasco, Laia Ramos, Susanna Aussó and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Adipocyte · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Iván Galván-FemeníaGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Mireia Obón-SantacanaGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
David PiñeyroHigh Content Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Marta Guindo-MartinezLife Sciences - Computational Genomics, Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC-CNS), Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier DuranGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Anna CarrerasGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Raquel PluvinetHigh Content Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Juan VelascoGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Laia RamosHigh Content Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Susanna AussóHigh Content Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
J M MercaderPrograms in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.
Lluis PuigBlood Division, Banc de Sang i Teixits, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel PeruchoCancer Genetics and Epigenetics Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
David TorrentsLife Sciences - Computational Genomics, Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC-CNS), Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona, Spain.
Victor MorenoUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), IDIBELL and CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain.
Lauro SumoyHigh Content Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.
Rafael de CidGenomesForLife-GCAT Lab Group, Program of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer (PMPPC), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Crta. de Can Ruti, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-6777
Institute of Predictive and Personalized Medicine of Cancer · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESBanc de Sang i Teixits · ESBarcelona Supercomputing Center · ESBroad Institute · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeritability estimates have revealed an important contribution of SNP variants for most common traits; however, SNP analysis by single-trait genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has failed to uncover their impact. In this study, we applied a multitrait GWAS approach to discover additional factor of the missing heritability of human anthropometric variation.

methodsWe analysed 205 traits, including diseases identified at baseline in the GCAT cohort (Genomes For Life- Cohort study of the Genomes of Catalonia) (n=4988), a Mediterranean adult population-based cohort study from the south of Europe. We estimated SNP heritability contribution and single-trait GWAS for all traits from 15 million SNP variants. Then, we applied a multitrait-related approach to study genome-wide association to anthropometric measures in a two-stage meta-analysis with the UK Biobank cohort (n=336 107).

resultsHeritability estimates (eg, skin colour, alcohol consumption, smoking habit, body mass index, educational level or height) revealed an important contribution of SNP variants, ranging from 18% to 77%. Single-trait analysis identified 1785 SNPs with genome-wide significance threshold. From these, several previously reported single-trait hits were confirmed in our sample with

conclusionConsidering multiple-related genetic phenotypes improve associated genome signal detection. These results indicate the potential value of data-driven multivariate phenotyping for genetic studies in large population-based cohorts to contribute to knowledge of complex traits.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, IndividualGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAnthropometryFemaleGenotypeHumansInheritance PatternsMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePublic Health SurveillanceRisk Assessmentcohortcomplex traitsgwasmultitraitphenome

Identifiers

PMID30166351
PMCPMC6252362
OpenAlexW2889348862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.