ArticleBMC nephrology2018
Yield of diagnostic tests in unexplained renal hypophosphatemia: a case series.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diuretic Use and Serum Phosphate: Rotterdam Study and UK Biobank.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Article
- The Causes of Hypo- and Hyperphosphatemia in Humans.Calcified tissue international · 2021Review
- Drug-Induced Hypophosphatemia: Current Insights.Drug safety · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIsolated renal hypophosphatemia may be inherited or acquired. An increasing number of patients with unexplained renal hypophosphatemia is being referred to our clinics, but the optimal diagnostic work-up is not known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield in these patients.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all patients who were referred because of unexplained isolated renal hypophosphatemia to two academic tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands in the period of 2013-2017.
resultsWe evaluated 17 patients. In five female patients renal hypophosphatemia could be attributed to the use of oral contraceptives. The other 12 patients had a median age of 48 years (10 males). There were no other signs of tubulopathy and none of the patients used drugs known to be associated with hypophosphatemia. FGF23 levels were above normal (> 125 RU/ml) in 2/12 patients. Genetic testing, performed in all patients, did not identify a mutation in genes known to be associated with renal phosphate wasting. A scan with a radiolabeled somatostatin analogue was performed in 8 patients. In one patient, with an FGF23 level of 110 RU/ml, an increased uptake of the somatostatin analog was observed due to tumor induced osteomalacia (TIO).
conclusionsOral contraceptive use is an important but under-recognized cause of renal hypophosphatemia. The cause of isolated renal hypophosphatemia remained unexplained in the majority of other patients despite extensive and expensive additional investigations. The pre-test probability for tumor-induced osteomalacia or inherited renal hypophosphatemia in a patient with aspecific complaints and a normal FGF23 level is low. Further research is needed to investigate which patients should be screened for TIO. At present we suggest to perform somatostatin scans only in patients with severe complaints, elevated FGF23 levels, or progressive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.