Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30193282›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2018

Screening for Syphilis Infection in Pregnant Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Jennifer S Lin, Michelle L Eder, Sarah I Bean

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Syphilis Complicating Pregnancy and Congenital Syphilis.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Syphilis in Dermatology: Recognition and Management.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A descriptive study of syphilis testing in Manitoba, Canada, 2015-2019.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. INCREASE OF INCIDENCE OF CONGENITAL SYPHILIS IN SANTA CATARINA STATE BETWEEN 2007-2017: TEMPORAL TREND ANALYSIS.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer S LinKaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Michelle L EderKaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Sarah I BeanKaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS HHSA290201200015I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The incidence of syphilis and congenital syphilis in the United States has increased after reaching historic lows in the early 2000s. Objective: To systematically review literature on the effectiveness and harms of screening for syphilis in pregnancy and the harms of penicillin treatment in pregnancy to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant English-language literature, published from January 1, 2008, to June 2, 2017. Ongoing surveillance was conducted through November 22, 2017. Study Selection: Studies conducted in countries categorized as "high" or "very high" on the Human Development Index that explicitly addressed 1 of 3 a priori-defined key questions. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers. Data from included studies were narratively synthesized without pooling data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of congenital syphilis; any harms of screening or penicillin treatment in pregnancy. Results: Seven studies in 8 publications were included. One observational study evaluated the implementation of syphilis screening in pregnancy in 2 441 237 women in China. From 2002 to 2012, screening for syphilis in all pregnant women increased from 89.8% to 97.2%, and the incidence of congenital syphilis decreased from 109.3 to 9.4 cases per 100 000 live births. Five studies (n = 21 795) evaluated the false-positive findings of treponemal tests and 1 study (n = 318) evaluated the false-negative findings of nontreponemal tests. These studies found that false-positives with treponemal-specific enzyme or chemiluminescent immunoassays were common (46.5%-88.2%), therefore warranting reflexive (automatic confirmatory) testing for all positive test findings. One study (n = 318) found no false-negatives with treponemal tests, and 1 study (n = 139) demonstrated the prozone phenomenon (false-negative response from high antibody titer) with rapid plasma reagin screening using undiluted samples (2.9%). No studies were identified for harms of penicillin in pregnancy. Conclusions and Relevance: Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women is associated with reduced incidence of congenital syphilis, and available evidence supports the need for reflexive testing for positive test results.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansIncidenceInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPenicillinsPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisSyphilis, CongenitalAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID30193282
PMCPMC13317666
OpenAlexW4256323563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.