SynthesisJAMA2018
Screening for Syphilis Infection in Pregnant Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Synthesis in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and diagnostic indicators for congenital syphilis: a Nationwide retrospective survey.Epidemiology and infection · 2025Article
- Congenital Syphilis Prevention Challenges, Pacific Coast of Colombia, 2018-2022.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Clinicopathologic assessment of secondary syphilis avoids misdiagnosis: results of comprehensive evaluation of 114 cases.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2024Article
- Syphilis Complicating Pregnancy and Congenital Syphilis.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Review
- Economic analysis of a new four-panel rapid screening test in antenatal care in Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Syphilis in Dermatology: Recognition and Management.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Article
- Predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes of pregnant mothers with syphilis based on a logistic regression model: a retrospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A descriptive study of syphilis testing in Manitoba, Canada, 2015-2019.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022Article
- Algorithm to guide re-exposure to penicillin in allergic pregnant women with syphilis: Efficacy and safety.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021Article
- Gender Equity and Vertically Transmitted Infections: A Country-Level Analysis Across 153 Countries.Health equity · 2021Article
- INCREASE OF INCIDENCE OF CONGENITAL SYPHILIS IN SANTA CATARINA STATE BETWEEN 2007-2017: TEMPORAL TREND ANALYSIS.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The incidence of syphilis and congenital syphilis in the United States has increased after reaching historic lows in the early 2000s. Objective: To systematically review literature on the effectiveness and harms of screening for syphilis in pregnancy and the harms of penicillin treatment in pregnancy to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant English-language literature, published from January 1, 2008, to June 2, 2017. Ongoing surveillance was conducted through November 22, 2017. Study Selection: Studies conducted in countries categorized as "high" or "very high" on the Human Development Index that explicitly addressed 1 of 3 a priori-defined key questions. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers. Data from included studies were narratively synthesized without pooling data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of congenital syphilis; any harms of screening or penicillin treatment in pregnancy. Results: Seven studies in 8 publications were included. One observational study evaluated the implementation of syphilis screening in pregnancy in 2 441 237 women in China. From 2002 to 2012, screening for syphilis in all pregnant women increased from 89.8% to 97.2%, and the incidence of congenital syphilis decreased from 109.3 to 9.4 cases per 100 000 live births. Five studies (n = 21 795) evaluated the false-positive findings of treponemal tests and 1 study (n = 318) evaluated the false-negative findings of nontreponemal tests. These studies found that false-positives with treponemal-specific enzyme or chemiluminescent immunoassays were common (46.5%-88.2%), therefore warranting reflexive (automatic confirmatory) testing for all positive test findings. One study (n = 318) found no false-negatives with treponemal tests, and 1 study (n = 139) demonstrated the prozone phenomenon (false-negative response from high antibody titer) with rapid plasma reagin screening using undiluted samples (2.9%). No studies were identified for harms of penicillin in pregnancy. Conclusions and Relevance: Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women is associated with reduced incidence of congenital syphilis, and available evidence supports the need for reflexive testing for positive test results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.