Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207936›Full record

ArticleRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc

Retroperitoneal Leiomyosarcoma From the Radiologic Pathology Archives.

Jamie Marko, Darcy J Wolfman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Current Progress in the CT- and MRI-Based Detection and Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis Complications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Giant retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie MarkoFrom the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (J.M.); American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (J.M., D.J.W.); and Community Radiology Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Washington, DC (D.J.W.).
Darcy J WolfmanFrom the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (J.M.); American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (J.M., D.J.W.); and Community Radiology Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Washington, DC (D.J.W.).
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leiomyosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm that shows smooth muscle differentiation. It is the second most common sarcoma to affect the retroperitoneum. Retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas may grow to large sizes before detection and may be an incidental finding at imaging. When symptomatic, retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma may cause compressive symptoms, including pain. Retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma most commonly manifests as a large soft-tissue mass, with areas of necrosis. The most frequent pattern of growth is an entirely extravascular mass. Less commonly, leiomyosarcoma may demonstrate both extravascular and intravascular components. Rarely, retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas are completely intravascular, typically arising from the inferior vena cava. Given its variable imaging features, a large variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions are included in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In this review, the authors discuss retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, with emphasis on the pathologic basis of disease, and illustrate the multimodality imaging appearances of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma using cases from the Radiologic Pathology Archives of the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology. The authors review important differential considerations of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, focusing on the extravascular pattern of growth, and emphasize clinical and imaging features that help radiologists differentiate leiomyosarcoma from the most frequent mimics. The information presented in this review will aid radiologists in fulfilling their key roles in the diagnosis, operative planning, and follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansLeiomyosarcomaPatient Care PlanningRetroperitoneal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30207936
PMCPMC6166742
OpenAlexW2890655082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.