Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30210345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Lixiang Zhai, Zi-Wan Ning, Tao Huang, Bo Wen, Cheng-Hui Liao, Cheng-Yuan Lin, Ling Zhao, Hai-Tao Xiao, Zhao-Xiang Bian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unlocking the Anti-Breast Cancer Potential ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Triterpenoids from the Leaves ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mulberry (Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolomic and Microbial Remodeling byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Anti-Hyperglycemic Effects of Refined Fractions fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lixiang ZhaiSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Zi-Wan NingSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Tao HuangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Bo WenSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Cheng-Hui LiaoShenzhen Research Institute and Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Shenzhen, China.
Cheng-Yuan LinSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Ling ZhaoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Hai-Tao XiaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhao-Xiang BianSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Baptist University · HKShenzhen University Health Science Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperlipidemia and hepatic steatosis afflict over 75% of patients with type 2 diabetes, causing diabetic dyslipidemia.

Indexed as

Cyclocarya paliurusDiabetic dyslipidemiahyperlipidemialipidomicnetwork pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID30210345
PMCPMC6121037
OpenAlexW2889030242

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.