Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214274›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2018

Both ipsilateral and contralateral localized vibratory stimulations modulated pain-related sensory thresholds on the foot in mice and humans.

Atsushi Doi, Juntaro Sakasaki, Chikato Tokunaga, Fumiya Sugita, Syota Kasae, Keisuke Nishimura, Yushi Sato, Takako Kuratsu, Sariya Hashiguchi, Min-Chul Shin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Local and Contralateral Effects after the Application of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation in Lower Limbs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi DoiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan, atsushidoi01@gmail.com.
Juntaro SakasakiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Tokyo-Wangan Rehabilitation Hospital, Narashino, Japan.
Chikato TokunagaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Himeno Hospital, Yame, Japan.
Fumiya SugitaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Tamana Central Hospital, Tamana, Japan.
Syota KasaeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shimizu Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Keisuke NishimuraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan.
Yushi SatoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Showa Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan.
Takako KuratsuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Konan Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Sariya HashiguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Asahino-Sogo Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Min-Chul ShinDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kumamoto Health Science University, Kumamoto, Japan, atsushidoi01@gmail.com.
Megumu YoshimuraNakamura Hospital, Nogata, Japan.
Kumamoto Health Science University · JPAso Iizuka Hospital · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JPKumamoto Orthopedic Surgery Hospital · JPNakamura Memorial Hospital · JPShizuoka City Shimizu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was aimed to investigate the effect of localized vibration on sensory thresholds in mice and humans using a novel quantitative method. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsThe sensory thresholds of 7-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were measured with four sine-wave electrostimulation frequencies (5, 50, 250, and 2,000 Hz) before and after applying 2-minute vibration to the plantar side of the foot in mice. In human participants (16 males and 16 females; mean age, 21.0±0.8 years), the sensory threshold was measured at 50 Hz before and after applying 2-minute and 5-minute vibrations to the dorsal side of the foot.

resultsApplication of a 2-minute vibration at either the ipsilateral or contralateral side modulated the sensory thresholds elicited by a 5- or 50-Hz right electrostimulation in mice. In human participants, application of a 5-minute vibration at either the ipsilateral or contralateral side modulated the sensory threshold elicited by 50-Hz right electrostimulation, but had no effect on local skin temperature. These results suggest that the right side of pain-related Aδ fibers (50 Hz) or C fibers (5 Hz) was modulated by the localized ipsilateral or contralateral side of vibratory stimuli, respectively, in mice and humans.

conclusionThe ability of contralateral vibration to modify the right sensory thresholds suggests possible involvement of the central nervous system in vibratory modulation.

Indexed as

central modulationelectrostimulationsensory thresholdvibration

Identifiers

PMID30214274
PMCPMC6118348
OpenAlexW2889537861

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.