Evidence mapPaperPMID 30217233Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

A three arm cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life intervention for reducing daily sitting time in office workers: study protocol.

Charlotte L Edwardson, Stuart J H Biddle, Alexandra Clarke-Cornwell, Stacy Clemes, Melanie J Davies, David W Dunstan, Helen Eborall, Malcolm H Granat, Laura J Gray, Genevieve N Healy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of a Workplace Sit-Stand Desk Intervention on Health and Productivity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. National implementation trial of BeUpstanding™: an online initiative for workers to sit less and move more.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Substituting Types of Physical Activity on Body Fat Mass and Work Efficiency among Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte L EdwardsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. ce95@le.ac.uk.
Stuart J H BiddleInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD, Australia.
Alexandra Clarke-CornwellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Stacy ClemesNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
Melanie J DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
David W DunstanBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen EborallDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Malcolm H GranatSchool of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Laura J GrayDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Genevieve N HealyBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gerry RichardsonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Thomas YatesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
University of Leicester · GBLoughborough University · GBUniversity of Salford · GBCurtin University · AUNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Southern Queensland · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health PHR/16/41/04National Institute for Health Research 16.41.04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOffice-based workers typically spend 70-85% of working hours, and a large proportion of leisure time, sitting. High levels of sitting have been linked to poor health. There is a need for fully powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with long-term follow-up to test the effectiveness of interventions to reduce sitting. This paper describes the methodology of a three-arm cluster RCT designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life intervention, delivered with and without a height-adjustable desk, for reducing daily sitting. METHODS/

designA three-arm cluster RCT of 33 clusters (660 council workers) will be conducted in three areas in England (Leicester; Manchester; Liverpool). Office groups (clusters) will be randomised to the SMART Work & Life intervention delivered with (group 1) or without (group 2) a height-adjustable desk or a control group (group 3). SMART Work & Life includes organisational (e.g., management buy-in, provision/support for standing meetings), environmental (e.g., relocating waste bins, printers), and group/individual (education, action planning, goal setting, addressing barriers, coaching, self-monitoring, social support) level behaviour change strategies, with strategies driven by workplace champions. Baseline, 3, 12 and 24 month measures will be taken. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Objectively measured daily sitting time (activPAL3). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: objectively measured sitting, standing, stepping, prolonged sitting and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time and number of steps at work and daily; objectively measured sleep (wrist accelerometry). Adiposity, blood pressure, fasting glucose, glycated haemoglobin, cholesterol (total, HDL, LDL) and triglycerides will be assessed from capillary blood samples. Questionnaires will examine dietary intake, fatigue, musculoskeletal issues, job performance and satisfaction, work engagement, occupational and general fatigue, stress, presenteeism, anxiety and depression and sickness absence (organisational records). Quality of life and resources used (e.g. GP visits, outpatient attendances) will also be assessed. We will conduct a full process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT will 1) help to understand how effective an important simple, yet relatively expensive environmental change is for reducing sitting, 2) provide evidence on changing behaviour across all waking hours, and 3) provide evidence for policy guidelines around population and workplace health and well-being.

trial registrationISRCTN11618007 . Registered on 21 January 2018.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorOccupational HealthPostureSedentary BehaviorAdultCluster AnalysisCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsWorkplaceactivPALBehaviour changeSit-standStandingWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID30217233
PMCPMC6137871
OpenAlexW2891631960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.