Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228226›Full record

ArticleScience signaling2018

The inositol phosphatase SHIP2 enables sustained ERK activation downstream of FGF receptors by recruiting Src kinases.

Bohumil Fafilek, Lukas Balek, Michaela Kunova Bosakova, Miroslav Varecha, Alexandru Nita, Tomas Gregor, Iva Gudernova, Jitka Krenova, Somadri Ghosh, Martin Piskacek and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science signaling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Achondroplasia: aligning mouse model with human clinical studies shows crucial importance of immediate postnatal start of the therapy.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Bohumil FafilekDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-7937
Lukas BalekDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-9159
Michaela Kunova BosakovaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7627-0344
Miroslav VarechaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-4241
Alexandru NitaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas GregorCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-1316
Iva GudernovaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jitka KrenovaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6679-0285
Somadri GhoshInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-5046
Martin PiskacekDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Lucie JonatovaDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-1571
Nicole H CernohorskyDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jennifer T ZiebaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Michal KostasDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Ellen Margrethe HaugstenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Jørgen WescheDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9200-9162
Christophe ErneuxInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0773-8206
Lukas TrantirekCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Deborah KrakowDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9906-4968
Pavel KrejciDepartment of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic. krejcip@med.muni.cz.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity of Oslo · NOCentral European Institute of Technology · CZUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Exome sequencing in the skeletal dysplasiasR01AR062651 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COHN, DANIEL H · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Unraveling the mechanisms of prenatal-onset disorders affecting the skeletonR01AR066124 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KRAKOW, DEBORAH · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
FLMNB causes progressive skeletal fusions via TGF-Beta/BMP signaling modulationF31AR066487 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ZIEBA, JENNIFER · 2015 to 2016
$60k
NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR066487NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062651NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustained activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) drives pathologies caused by mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs). We previously identified the inositol phosphatase SHIP2 (also known as INPPL1) as an FGFR-interacting protein and a target of the tyrosine kinase activities of FGFR1, FGFR3, and FGFR4. We report that loss of SHIP2 converted FGF-mediated sustained ERK activation into a transient signal and rescued cell phenotypes triggered by pathologic FGFR-ERK signaling. Mutant forms of SHIP2 lacking phosphoinositide phosphatase activity still associated with FGFRs and did not prevent FGF-induced sustained ERK activation, demonstrating that the adaptor rather than the catalytic activity of SHIP2 was required. SHIP2 recruited Src family kinases to the FGFRs, which promoted FGFR-mediated phosphorylation and assembly of protein complexes that relayed signaling to ERK. SHIP2 interacted with FGFRs, was phosphorylated by active FGFRs, and promoted FGFR-ERK signaling at the level of phosphorylation of the adaptor FRS2 and recruitment of the tyrosine phosphatase PTPN11. Thus, SHIP2 is an essential component of canonical FGF-FGFR signal transduction and a potential therapeutic target in FGFR-related disorders.

Indexed as

MAP Kinase Signaling SystemAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCell Line, TumorEnzyme ActivationExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesHEK293 CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factorsrc-Family KinasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFRS2 protein, humanINPPL1 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11PTPN11 protein, humanReceptors, Fibroblast Growth Factorsrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID30228226
PMCPMC12677889
OpenAlexW2889826045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.