ArticleBMC genomics2018
Analysis of porcine body size variation using re-sequencing data of miniature and large pigs.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative multi-omics analysis of growth plate regulation underlying body size in miniature pigs.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Latitude-driven adaptive evolution of body length in diverse pig breeds across China.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Omics in mini-livestock: a genomic perspective on the future of sustainable food systems.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Convergent dwarfism consequences of minipigs under independent artificial selections.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Scans for Signatures of Selection in Genomes of Wagyu and Buryat Cattle Breeds Reveal Candidate Genes and Genetic Variants for Adaptive Phenotypes and Production Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genomic Dissection through Whole-Genome Resequencing of Five Local Pig Breeds from Shanghai, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The selected genes NR6A1, RSAD2-CMPK2, and COL3A1 contribute to body size variation in Meishan pigs through different patterns.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Identification of Body Size Determination Related Candidate Genes in Domestic Pig Using Genome-Wide Selection Signal Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Identification and validation of a regulatory mutation upstream of the BMP2 gene associated with carcass length in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Pathways involved in pony body size development.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Assessing breed integrity of Göttingen Minipigs.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Haplotype Block Analysis Reveals Candidate Genes and QTLs for Meat Quality and Disease Resistance in Chinese Jiangquhai Pig Breed.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDomestication has led to substantial phenotypic and genetic variation in domestic animals. In pigs, the size of so called minipigs differs by one order of magnitude compared to breeds of large body size. We used biallelic SNPs identified from re-sequencing data to compare various publicly available wild and domestic populations against two minipig breeds to gain better understanding of the genetic background of the extensive body size variation. We combined two complementary measures, expected heterozygosity and the composite likelihood ratio test implemented in "SweepFinder", to identify signatures of selection in Minipigs. We intersected these sweep regions with a measure of differentiation, namely F
resultsSelective sweep analysis identified putative sweep regions for growth and subsequent gene annotation provided a comprehensive set of putative candidate genes. A long swept haplotype on chromosome X, descending from the Goettingen Minipig founders was associated with a reduction of adult body length by 3% in F
conclusionThe resulting set of genes in putative sweep regions implies that the genetic background of body size variation in pigs is polygenic rather than mono- or oligogenic. Identified genes suggest alterations in metabolic functions and a possible insulin resistance to contribute to miniaturization. A size QTL located within the sweep on chromosome X, with an estimated effect of 3% on body length, is comparable to the largest known in pigs or other species. The androgen receptor AR, previously known to influence pig performance and carcass traits, is the most obvious potential candidate gene within this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.