Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30235845›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2018

Relative Protein Intake and Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Hélio José Coelho-Júnior, Luiz Milano-Teixeira, Bruno Rodrigues, Reury Bacurau, Emanuele Marzetti, Marco Uchida

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multidimensional determinants of active and healthy aging trajectories: a position paper from the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Validation of the German version of the Protein Screener 55.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hélio José Coelho-JúniorApplied Kinesiology Laboratory⁻AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, Campinas-SP 13.083-851, Brazil. coelhojunior@hotmail.com.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-9514
Luiz Milano-TeixeiraApplied Kinesiology Laboratory⁻AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, Campinas-SP 13.083-851, Brazil. teixeira.luisfelipe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7669-6011
Bruno RodriguesApplied Kinesiology Laboratory⁻AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, Campinas-SP 13.083-851, Brazil. prof.brodrigues@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7669-6011
Reury BacurauSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, Rua Arlindo Béttio, 1000-Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo-SP 03828-000, Brazil. reurybacurau@usp.br.
Emanuele MarzettiDepartment of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopedics, Teaching Hospital "Agostino Gemelli", Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy. emarzetti@live.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9567-6983
Marco UchidaApplied Kinesiology Laboratory⁻AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, Campinas-SP 13.083-851, Brazil. uchida@g.unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The present work aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, in order to investigate the association of relative protein intake and physical function in older adults; (2) Methods: Observational studies, that investigated the association between protein intake and physical function in older adults, were retrieved from MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, AgeLine, EMBASE, and Cochrane-CENTRAL. Two independent researchers conducted study selection and data extraction; (3) Results: Very high protein intake (≥1.2 g/kg/day) and high protein intake (≥1.0 g/kg/day) groups showed better lower limb physical functioning and walking speed (WS) performance, respectively, in comparison to individuals who present relative low protein (<0.80 g/kg/day) intake. On the other hand, relative high protein intake does not seem to propitiate a better performance on isometric handgrip (IHG) and chair rise in comparison to relative low protein intake. In addition, there were no significant differences in the physical functioning of high and middle protein intake groups; (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, findings of the present study indicate that a very high (≥1.2 g/kg/day) and high protein intake (≥1.0 g/kg/day) are associated with better lower-limb physical performance, when compared to low protein (<0.80 g/kg/day) intake, in community-dwelling older adults. These findings act as additional evidence regarding the potential need to increase protein guidelines to above the current recommendations. However, large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the addictive effects of high-protein diets (≥1.0 g/kg/day) in comparison to the current recommendations on physical functioning. All data are available in the Open ScienceFramework.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyDiet, High-ProteinDiet, Protein-RestrictedExerciseHealthy AgingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDietary ProteinsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNutritional StatusNutritive ValueObservational Studies as TopicDietary Proteinsphysical functionprotein intakesarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID30235845
PMCPMC6163569
OpenAlexW2891801965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.