ArticleToxins2018
Introduction to the
Article in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Perspectives on Chronic Renal Disorders.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Activation and targetability of TYMP-IL-6-TF signaling in the skin microenvironment in uremic calciphylaxis.Science translational medicine · 2025Article
- Indoxyl sulphate-TNFα axis mediates uremic encephalopathy in rodent acute kidney injury.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Proceedings of a membrane update symposium: advancements, scientific insights, and future trends for dialysis membranes for enhanced clinical outcomes in end stage kidney disease patients.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024Article
- Tryptophan Metabolites Target Transmembrane and Immunoglobulin Domain-Containing 1 Signaling to Augment Renal Tubular Injury.The American journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Clinical relevance of abstruse transport phenomena in haemodialysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Review
- The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?Clinical kidney journal · 2021Review
- Gut Dysbiosis and the Intestinal Microbiome:Microorganisms · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.